DNA encoding hyaluronan synthase from pasturella multocida and methods of use

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to a nucleic acid segment having a coding region segment encoding enzymatically active  Pasturella multocida  hyaluronate synthase (PmHAS), and to the use of this nucleic acid segment in the preparation of recombinant cells which produce hyaluronate synthase and its hyaluronic acid product. Hyaluronate is also known as hyaluronic acid or hyaluronan. The present invention also relates to the use of the PmHAS in constructing “knock-out” mutant strains of  P. multocida  for use in vaccinations. The present invention further relates to the use of the PmHAS in diagnostic tests in the field determinations of livestock  P. multocida  infection.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This application is a continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/283,402, entitled DNA ENCODING HYALURONAN SYNTHASE FROM PASTURELLA MULTOCIDA AND USES THEREOF, filed Apr. 1, 1999; This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) Provisional U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 60/080,414, entitled A UNIQUE HYALURONAN SYNTHASE FROM PASTURELLA MULTOCIDA, filed on Apr. 2, 1998, which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This application is also a continuation-in-part to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/178,851 entitled HYALURONAN SYNTHASE GENE AND USES THEREOF, filed on Oct. 26, 1998, now abandoned which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

STATEMENT AS TO FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

[0002] This application was supported in part by a National Research Initiative grant for Sustaining Animal Health and Well-Being 94-37204-0929 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The United States Government may have rights in and to this application by virtue of this funding.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] 1. Field of the Invention

[0004] The present invention relates to a DNA sequence encoding hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella multocida. More particularly, the present invention relates to a DNA sequence encoding hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella multocida which is capable of being placed into a recombinant construct so as to be able to express hyaluronan synthase in a foreign host. The present invention also relates to methods of using a DNA sequence encoding hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella multocida to (1) make hyaluronan polymers of varying size distribution; (2) make hyaluronan polymers incorporating substitute or additional base sugars; (3) develop new and novel animal vaccines; and (4) develop new and novel diagnostic tests for the detection and identification of animal pathogens.

[0005] 2. Brief Description of the Background Art

[0006] The polysaccharide hyaluronic acid (“HA”) or hyaluronan is an essential component of higher animals that serves both structural and recognition roles. In mammals and birds, HA is present in large quantities in the skin, the joint synovial fluid, and the vitreous humor of the eye. Certain pathogenic bacteria, namely, Gram-positive Group A and C Streptococcus and Gram-negative Pasturella multocida Carter Type A, produce extracellular capsules containing HA with the same chemical structure as the HA molecule found in their vertebrate hosts. This “molecular mimicry” foils attempts to mount a strong antibody response to the capsular polysaccharide. In contrast, capsular polysaccharides with different structures produced by other bacteria are often quite antigenic. The HA capsule also apparently helps the pathogens evade host defenses including phagocytosis.

[0007] Historically, researchers in the field have not succeeded in cloning or identifying Hyaluronan Synthase (“HAS”) from Pasturella. Bacterial HAS enzymes from Group A & C Streptococcus have been identified and cloned. HasA from Streptococcus pyogenes was the first HAS to be definitively identified. This integral membrane protein utilizes intracellular UDP-GlcA and UDP-GlcNAc as substrates. The nascent HA chain is extruded through the membrane to form the extracellular capsule. A Xenopus protein, DG42, has also been determined to be a HAS. Several human and murine homologs of DG42, named HAS1, HAS2 and HAS3, have also been identified. There is considerable similarity among these molecularly cloned mammalian enzymes at the amino acid level, but they reside on different chromosomes. The unique HAS from P. multocida has a primary structure that does not strongly resemble the previously cloned enzymes from Streptococcus, PBCV-1 virus or higher animals.

[0008] A viral HAS, with an ORF called A98R, has been identified as being 28-30% identical to the streptococcal and vertebrate enzymes. PBCV-1 (Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus) produces an authentic HA polysaccharide shortly after infection of its Chlorella-like green algae host. A98R is the first virally encoded enzyme identified as producing a carbohydrate polymer.

[0009] Carter type A P. multocida, the causative agent of fowl cholera, is responsible for great economic losses in the U.S. poultry industry. Acapsular mutants of P. multocida do not thrive in the bloodstream of turkeys after intravenous injection, where encapsulated parental strains multiply quickly and cause death within 1 to 2 days. Spontaneously arising mutant strain which is acapsular, was also 10⁵-fold less virulent than wild-type, but the nature of the genetic defects in all the cases before the disclosed mutant (as described hereinafter) was not known.

[0010] Pasturella bacterial pathogens cause extensive losses to U.S. agriculture. The extracellular polysaccharide capsule of P. multocida has been proposed to be a major virulence factor. The Type A capsule is composed of a polysaccharide, namely HA, that is identical to the normal polysaccharide in the host's body and thus invisible to the immune system. This“molecular mimicry” also hinders host defenses such as phagocytosis and complement-mediated lysis. Furthermore, HA is not strongly immunogenic since the polymer is a normal component of the host body. The capsules of other bacteria that are composed of different polysaccharides, however, are usually major targets of the immune response. The antibodies generated against capsular polymers are often responsible for clearance of microorganisms and long-term immunity.

[0011] Knowing the factors responsible for a pathogen's virulence provides clues on how to defeat the disease intelligently and efficaciously. In Type A P. multocida, one of the virulence factors is the protective shield of nonimmunogenic HA, an almost insurmountable barrier for host defenses. A few strains do not appear to rely on the HA capsule for protection, but utilize other unknown factors to resist the host mechanisms. Alternatively, these strains may possess much smaller capsules that are not detected by classical tests.

[0012] For chickens and especially turkeys, fowl cholera can be devastating. A few to 1,000 cells of some encapsulated strains can kill a turkey in 24-48 hours. Fowl cholera is an economically important disease in North America. Studies done in the late 1980s show some of the effects of fowl cholera on the turkey industry: (i) fowl cholera causes 14.7 to 18% of all sickness, (ii) in one state alone the annual loss was $600,000, (iii) it costs $0.40/bird to treat a sick flock with antibiotics, and (iv) it costs $0.12/bird for treatment to prevent infection.

[0013] Certain strains of Type A P. multocida cause pneumonic lesions and shipping fever in cattle subjected to stress. The subsequent reduction in weight gain at the feedlot causes major losses. The bovine strains are somewhat distinct from fowl cholera strains, but the molecular basis for these differences in host range preference is not yet clear. Type A also causes half of the pneumonia in swine. Type D P. multocida is most well known for its involvement in atrophic rhinitis, a high priority disease in swine.

[0014] Type D capsular polymer has an unknown structure that appears to be some type of glycosaminoglycan; this is the same family of polymers that includes HA. This disease is also precipitated by Bordetella bronchiseptica, but the condition is worse when both bacterial species are present. It is estimated that Type F causes about 10% of the fowl cholera caes. In this case, the capsular polymer is not HA, but a related polymer called chondroitin.

[0015] Currently, disease prevention on the fowl range is mediated by two elements: vaccines and antibiotics, as well as strict sanitation. The utility of the first option is limited, since there are many serotypes in the field and vaccines are only effective against a limited subset of the entire pathogen spectrum. Killed-cell vaccine is dispensed by labor-intensive injection, and the protection obtained is not high. Therefore, this route is usually reserved for the breeder animals. More effective live-cell vaccines can be delivered via the water supply, but it is difficult to dose a flock of thousands evenly. Additionally, live “avirulent” vaccines can sometimes cause disease themselves if the birds are otherwise stressed or sick. The most common reason for this unpredictability is that these avirulent strains arose from spontaneous mutations in unknown or uncharacterized genes. Protocols that utilize repeated alternating exposure to live and dead vaccines can protect birds only against challenge with the same serotype.

[0016] The second disease prevention option is antibiotics. These are used at either subtherapeutic doses to prevent infection or at high doses to combat fowl cholera in infected birds. The percentage of birds with disease may drop with drug treatment, but timely and extensive treatment is necessary. Late doses or premature withdrawal of antibiotics often results in chronic fowl cholera and sickly birds with abscesses or lesions that lead to condemnation and lost sales. Furthermore, since resistant strains of P. multocida continually arise and drug costs are high, this solution is not attractive in the long run. In addition, Type F P. multocida may cause 5-10% of fowl cholera in North America. A vaccine directed against Type A strains may not fully protect against this other capsular type if it emerges as a major pathogen in the future. In the cattle and swine industries, no vaccine has been totally satisfactory. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is used to avoid losses in weight gain, but this option is expensive and subject to the microbial resistance issue.

[0017] In the present invention, enzymes involved in making the protective bacterial HA capsule have been identified at the gene/DNA level. The identification of these enzymes will lead to disease intervention by blocking capsule synthesis of pathogens with specific inhibitors that spare host HA biosynthesis. For example, a drug mimicking the substrates used to make HA or a regulator of the P. multocida HA synthase stops production of the bacterial HA polysaccharide, and thus blocks capsule formation. This is a direct analogy to many current antibiotics that have dissimilar effects on microbial and host systems. This approach is preferred because the P. multocida HA synthase and the vertebrate HA synthase are very different at the protein level. Therefore, it is likely that the enzymes also differ in reaction mechanism or substrate binding sites.

[0018]P. multocida, once stripped of its protective capsule shield is significantly more vulnerable a target for host defenses. Phagocytes readily engulfed and destroyed by the acapsular microbes. The host complement complex reaches and disrupts the sensitive outer membrane of bacteria. Antibodies are more readily generated against the newly exposed immunogens, such as the lipopolysaccharides and surface proteins that determine somatic serotype in P. multocida. These antibodies are better able to bind to acapsular cells later in the immune response. Thus, the immune response from vaccinations are more effective and more cost-effective. Capsule-inhibiting drugs are substantial additions to the treatment of fowl cholera.

[0019] The present invention and use of the capsule biosynthesis of Type A P. multocida aids in the understanding of the other capsular serotypes. DNA probes have been used to type A capsule genes to establish that Type D and F possess similar homologs.

[0020] High molecular weight HA also has a wide variety of useful applications—ranging from cosmetics to eye surgery. Due to its potential for high viscosity and its high biocompatibility, HA finds particular application in eye surgery as a replacement for vitreous fluid. HA has also been used to treat racehorses for traumatic arthritis by intra-articular injections of HA, in shaving cream as a lubricant, and in a variety of cosmetic products due to its physiochemical properties of high viscosity and its ability to retain moisture for long periods of time. In fact, in August of 1997 the U.S. Food and Drug Agency approved the use of high molecular weight HA in the treatment of severe arthritis through the injection of such high molecular weight HA directly into the affected joints. In general, the higher molecular weight HA that is employed the better. This is because HA solution viscosity increases with the average molecular weight of the individual HA polymer molecules in the solution. Unfortunately, very high molecular weight HA, such as that ranging up to 10⁷, has been difficult to obtain by currently available isolation procedures. To address these or other difficulties, there is a need for new methods and constructs that can be used to produce HA having one or more improved properties such as greater purity or ease of preparation. In particular, there is a need to develop methodology for the production of larger amounts of relatively high molecular weight and relatively pure HA than is currently commercially available. There is yet another need to be able to develop methodology for the production of HA having a modified size distribution (HA_(ΔSIZE)) as well as HA having a modified structure (HA_(ΔMOD)).

[0021] The present invention, therefore, functionally characterizes the Type A P. multocida genes involved in capsule biosynthesis, assesses the role of the capsule as a virulence factor in fowl cholera, and has obtained the homologous genes involved in Type D and F capsule biosynthesis. With this information, vaccines have been developed utilizing “knock out” P. multocida genes that do not produce HAS. These acapsular avirulent strains have the ability to act as vaccines for fowl cholera or shipping fever.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0022] The present invention relates to a novel HAS that produces HA. Using various molecular biology techniques, a gene for a new HAS was found in fowl cholera pathogen Type A Pasturella multocida. This new HAS from Pasturella multocida, (“PmHAS”), was cloned and shown to be functional in other species of bacteria.

[0023] Thus, a new source of HA has been identified. The DNA sequence of PmHAS may also be used to generate potential attenuated vaccine strains of P. multocida bacteria after knocking out the normal microbial gene by homologous recombination with a disrupted version. Additionally, the PmHAS DNA sequence allows for the generation of diagnostic bacterial typing probes for related P. multocida types that are agricultural pathogens of fowl, cattle, sheep and swine.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024]FIG. 1 is a partial sequence alignment of PmHAS P. multocida and other glycosyltransferases from other bacteria.

[0025]FIG. 2 is a sequence alignment of residues 342-383 of PmHAS as compared to residues 362-404 of the mammalian UDP-GalNAc:polypeptide GalNAc-transferase.

[0026]FIG. 3 is an autoradiogram representation of a photoaffinity labeling study with UDP-sugar analogs of PmHAS.

[0027]FIG. 4 is an autoradiogram depicting the reduced or absent photaffinity labeling of PmHAS in various Tn mutants of PmHAS.

[0028]FIG. 5 depicts photomicrographs demonstrating HA production in recombinant E. coli.

[0029]FIG. 6 graphically depicts the construction of pPmHAS and its subcloning into an expression vector.

[0030]FIG. 7 depicts the pH dependence of PmHAS activity.

[0031]FIG. 8 depicts metal dependence of HAS activity.

[0032]FIG. 9 depicts HAS activity dependence on UDP-GlcNAc concentration.

[0033]FIG. 10 depicts HAS activity dependence on UDP-GlcA concentration.

[0034]FIG. 11 is a Hanes-Woolf plot estimation of V_(MAX) and K_(m).

[0035]FIG. 12 is a Southern blot mapping of Tn mutants.

[0036]FIG. 13 depicts chimeric DNA templates for sequence analysis of Tn disruption sites.

[0037]FIG. 14 is a diagrammatic representation of a portion of the HA biosynthesis locus of Type A P. multocida.

[0038]FIG. 15 is a Southern blot analysis of various capsule types of P. multocida with Type A capsule gene probes.

[0039]FIG. 16 is an electrophoretogram of the PCR of the Type A DNA and heterologous DNA with various Type A primers.

[0040]FIG. 17 is a partial sequence comparison of type A and F KfaA homologs and E. coli KfaA.

[0041]FIG. 18 is a schematic of wild-type HAS gene versus a knockout mutant gene.

[0042]FIG. 19 is the molecular biological confirmation of the acapsular knockout mutant by Southern blot and PCR analyses.

[0043]FIG. 20 is a sequence comparison of Type A and F P. multocida.

[0044]FIG. 21 is a Western blot anaylsis of native and recombinant PmHAS proteins.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0045] Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.

[0046] As used herein, the term “nucleic acid segment” and “DNA segment” are used interchangeably and refer to a DNA molecule which has been isolated free of total genomic DNA of a particular species. Therefore, a “purified” DNA or nucleic acid segment as used herein, refers to a DNA segment which contains a Hyaluronate Synthase (“HAS”) coding sequence yet is isolated away from, or purified free from, unrelated genomic DNA, for example, total Pasturella multocida or, for example, mammalian host genomic DNA. Included within the term “DNA segment”, are DNA segments and smaller fragments of such segments, and also recombinant vectors, including, for example, plasmids, cosmids, phage, viruses, and the like.

[0047] Similarly, a DNA segment comprising an isolated or purified PmHAS gene refers to a DNA segment including HAS coding sequences isolated substantially away from other naturally occurring genes or protein encoding sequences. In this respect, the term “gene” is used for simplicity to refer to a functional protein, polypeptide or peptide encoding unit. As will be understood by those in the art, this functional term includes genomic sequences, cDNA sequences or combinations thereof. “Isolated substantially away from other coding sequences” means that the gene of interest, in this case PmHAS, forms the significant part of the coding region of the DNA segment, and that the DNA segment does not contain large portions of naturally-occurring coding DNA, such as large chromosomal fragments or other functional genes or DNA coding regions. Of course, this refers to the DNA segment as originally isolated, and does not exclude genes or coding regions later added to, or intentionally left in the segment by the hand of man.

[0048] Due to certain advantages associated with the use of prokaryotic sources, one will likely realize the most advantages upon isolation of the HAS gene from the prokaryote P. multocida. One such advantage is that, typically, eukaryotic enzymes may require significant post-translational modifications that can only be achieved in a eukaryotic host. This will tend to limit the applicability of any eukaryotic HA synthase gene that is obtained. Moreover, those of ordinary skill in the art will likely realize additional advantages in terms of time and ease of genetic manipulation where a prokaryotic enzyme gene is sought to be employed. These additional advantages include (a) the ease of isolation of a prokaryotic gene because of the relatively small size of the genome and, therefore, the reduced amount of screening of the corresponding genomic library and (b) the ease of manipulation because the overall size of the coding region of a prokaryotic gene is significantly smaller due to the absence of introns. Furthermore, if the product of the PmHAS gene (i.e., the enzyme) requires posttranslational modifications, these would best be achieved in a similar prokaryotic cellular environment (host) from which the gene was derived.

[0049] Preferably, DNA sequences in accordance with the present invention will further include genetic control regions which allow the expression of the sequence in a selected recombinant host. Of course, the nature of the control region employed will generally vary depending on the particular use (e.g., cloning host) envisioned.

[0050] In particular embodiments, the invention concerns isolated DNA segments and recombinant vectors incorporating DNA sequences which encode a PmHAS gene, that includes within its amino acid sequence an amino acid sequence in accordance with SEQ ID NO: 1. Moreover, in other particular embodiments, the invention concerns isolated DNA segments and recombinant vectors incorporating DNA sequences which encode a gene that includes within its amino acid sequence the amino acid sequence of an HAS gene or DNA, and in particular to an HAS gene or cDNA, corresponding to Pasturella multocida HAS. For example, where the DNA segment or vector encodes a full length HAS protein, or is intended for use in expressing the HAS protein, preferred sequences are those which are essentially as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1

[0051] Truncated PmHAS also falls within the definition of preferred sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1. For instance, at the c terminus, approximately 270-272 amino acids may be removed from the sequence and still have a functioning HAS. Those of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that simple amino acid removal from either end of the PmHAS sequence can be accomplished. The truncated versions of the sequence simply have to be checked for HAS activity in order to determine if such a truncated sequence is still capable of producing HAS.

[0052] Nucleic acid segments having HA synthase activity may be isolated by the methods described herein. The term “a sequence essentially as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 means that the sequence substantially corresponds to a portion of SEQ ID NO: 1 and has relatively few amino acids which are not identical to, or a biologically functional equivalent of, the amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 1. The term “biologically functional equivalent” is well understood in the art and is further defined in detail herein, as a gene having a sequence essentially as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1, and that is associated with the ability of prokaryotes to produce HA or a hyaluronic acid coat.

[0053] The art is replete with examples of practitioners ability to make structural changes to a nucleic acid segment (i.e. encoding conserved or semi-conserved amino acid substitutions) and still preserve its enzymatic or functional activity. See for example: (1) Risler et al. “Amino Acid Substitutions in Structurally Related Proteins. A Pattern Recognition Approach.” J. Mol. Biol. 204:1019-1029 (1988) [“. . . according to the observed exchangeability of amino acid side chains, only four groups could be delineated; (i) Ile and Val; (ii) Leu and Met, (iii) Lys, Arg, and Gln, and (iv) Tyr and Phe.”]; (2) Niefind et al. “Amino Acid Similarity Coefficients for Protein Modeling and Sequence Alignment Derived from Main-Chain Folding Anoles.” J. Mol. Biol. 219:481-497 (1991) [similarity parameters allow amino acid substitutions to be designed]; and (3) Overington et al. “Environment-Specific Amino Acid Substitution Tables: Tertiary Templates and Prediction of Protein Folds,” Protein Science 1:216-226 (1992) [“Analysis of the pattern of observed substitutions as a function of local environment shows that there are distinct patterns . . .” Compatible changes can be made.]

[0054] These references and countless others, indicate that one of ordinary skill in the art, given a nucleic acid sequence, could make substitutions and changes to the nucleic acid sequence without changing its functionality. Also, a substituted nucleic acid segment may be highly identical and retain its enzymatic activity with regard to its unadulterated parent, and yet still fail to hybridize thereto.

[0055] The invention discloses nucleic acid segments encoding an enzymatically active hyaluronate synthase from P. multocida—PmHAS One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that substitutions can be made to the PmHAS nucleic acid segment listed in SEQ ID NO: 2 without deviating outside the scope and claims of the present invention. Standardized and accepted functionally equivalent amino acid substitutions are presented in Table A. TABLE A Conservative and Semi- Amino Acid Group Conservative Substitutions NonPolar R Groups Alanine, Valine, Leucine, Isoleucine, Proline, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Tryptophan Polar, but uncharged, R Groups Glycine, Serine, Threonine, Cysteine, Asparagine, Glutamine Negatively Charged R Groups Aspartic Acid, Glutamic Acid Positively Charged R Groups Lysine, Arginine, Histidine

[0056] Another preferred embodiment of the present invention is a purified nucleic acid segment that encodes a protein in accordance with SEQ ID NO: 1, further defined as a recombinant vector. As used herein, the term “recombinant vector” refers to a vector that has been modified to contain a nucleic acid segment that encodes an HAS protein, or fragment thereof. The recombinant vector may be further defined as an expression vector comprising a promoter operatively linked to said HAS encoding nucleic acid segment.

[0057] A further preferred embodiment of the present invention is a host cell, made recombinant with a recombinant vector comprising an HAS gene. The preferred recombinant host cell may be a prokaryotic cell. In another embodiment, the recombinant host cell is a eukaryotic cell. As used herein, the term “engineered” or “recombinant” cell is intended to refer to a cell into which a recombinant gene, such as a gene encoding HAS, has been introduced. Therefore, engineered cells are distinguishable from naturally occurring cells which do not contain a recombinantly introduced gene. Engineered cells are thus cells having a gene or genes introduced through the hand of man. Recombinantly introduced genes will either be in the form of a cDNA gene, a copy of a genomic gene, or will include genes positioned adjacent to a promoter not naturally associated with the particular introduced gene.

[0058] In preferred embodiments, the HA synthase-encoding DNA segments further include DNA sequences, known in the art functionally as origins of replication or “replicons”, which allow replication of contiguous sequences by the particular host. Such origins allow the preparation of extrachromosomally localized and replicating chimeric segments or plasmids, to which HA synthase DNA sequences are ligated. In more preferred instances, the employed origin is one capable of replication in bacterial hosts suitable for biotechnology applications. However, for more versatility of cloned DNA segments, it may be desirable to alternatively or even additionally employ origins recognized by other host systems whose use is contemplated (such as in a shuttle vector).

[0059] The isolation and use of other replication origins such as the SV40, polyoma or bovine papilloma virus origins, which may be employed for cloning or expression in a number of higher organisms, are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. In certain embodiments, the invention may thus be defined in terms of a recombinant transformation vector which includes the HA synthase coding gene sequence together with an appropriate replication origin and under the control of selected control regions.

[0060] Thus, it will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that other means may be used to obtain the HAS gene or cDNA, in light of the present disclosure. For example, polymerase chain reaction or RT-PCR produced DNA fragments may be obtained which contain full complements of genes or cDNAs from a number of sources, including other strains of Pasturellas or from eukaryotic sources, such as cDNA libraries. Virtually any molecular cloning approach may be employed for the generation of DNA fragments in accordance with the present invention. Thus, the only limitation generally on the particular method employed for DNA isolation is that the isolated nucleic acids should encode a biologically functional equivalent HA synthase.

[0061] Once the DNA has been isolated it is ligated together with a selected vector. Virtually any cloning vector can be employed to realize advantages in accordance with the invention. Typical useful vectors include plasmids and phages for use in prokaryotic organisms and even viral vectors for use in eukaryotic organisms. Examples include pKK223-3, pSA3, recombinant lambda, SV40, polyoma, adenovirus, bovine papilloma virus and retroviruses. However, it is believed that particular advantages will ultimately be realized where vectors capable of replication in both Lactococcus or Bacillus strains and E. coli are employed.

[0062] Vectors such as these, exemplified by the pSA3 vector of Dao and Ferretti or the pAT19 vector of Trieu-Cuot, et al., allow one to perform clonal colony selection in an easily manipulated host such as E. coli, followed by subsequent transfer back into a food grade Lactococcus or Bacillus strain for production of HA. These are benign and well studied organisms used in the production of certain foods and biotechnology products. These are advantageous in that one can augment the Lactococcus or Bacillus strain's ability to synthesize HA through gene dosaging (i.e., providing extra copies of the HA synthase gene by amplification) and/or inclusion of additional genes to increase the availability of HA precursors. The inherent ability of a bacterium to synthesize HA can also be augmented through the formation of extra copies, or amplification, of the plasmid that carries the HA synthase gene. This amplification can account for up to a 10-fold increase in plasmid copy number and, therefore, the HA synthase gene copy number.

[0063] Another procedure that would further augment HA synthase gene copy number is the insertion of multiple copies of the gene into the plasmid. Another technique would include integrating the HAS gene into chromosomal DNA. This extra amplification would be especially feasible, since the bacterial HA synthase gene size is small. In some scenarios, the chromosomal DNA-ligated vector is employed to transfect the host that is selected for clonal screening purposes such as E. coli, through the use of a vector that is capable of expressing the inserted DNA in the chosen host.

[0064] In certain other embodiments, the invention concerns isolated DNA segments and recombinant vectors that include within their sequence a nucleic acid sequence essentially as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 The term “essentially as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 is used in the same sense as described above and means that the nucleic acid sequence substantially corresponds to a portion of SEQ ID NO: 2 and has relatively few codons which are not identical, or functionally equivalent, to the codons of SEQ ID NO: 2 The term “functionally equivalent codon” is used herein to refer to codons that encode the same amino acid, such as the six codons for arginine or serine, as set forth in Table A, and also refers to codons that encode biologically equivalent amino acids.

[0065] It will also be understood that amino acid and nucleic acid sequences may include additional residues, such as additional N- or C-terminal amino acids or 5′ or 3′ nucleic acid sequences, and yet still be essentially as set forth in one of the sequences disclosed herein, so long as the sequence meets the criteria set forth above, including the maintenance of biological protein activity where protein expression and enzyme activity is concerned. The addition of terminal sequences particularly applies to nucleic acid sequences which may, for example, include various non-coding sequences flanking either of the 5′ or 3′ portions of the coding region or may include various internal sequences, which are known to occur within genes. Furthermore, residues may be removed from the N or C terminal amino acids and yet still be essentially as set forth in one of the sequences disclosed herein, so long as the sequence meets the criteria set forth above, as well.

[0066] Allowing for the degeneracy of the genetic code as well as conserved and semi-conserved substitutions, sequences which have between about 40% and about 80%; or more preferably, between about 80% and about 90%; or even more preferably, between about 90% and about 99%; of nucleotides which are identical to the nucleotides of SEQ ID NO: 2 will be sequences which are “essentially as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2”. Sequences which are essentially the same as those set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 may also be functionally defined as sequences which are capable of hybridizing to a nucleic acid segment containing the complement of SEQ ID NO: 2 under standard or less stringent hybridizing conditions. Suitable standard hybridization conditions will be well known to those of skill in the art and are clearly set forth herein.

[0067] The term “standard hybridization conditions” as used herein, is used to describe those conditions under which substantially complementary nucleic acid segments will form standard Watson-Crick base-pairing. A number of factors are known that determine the specificity of binding or hybridization, such as pH, temperature, salt concentration, the presence of agents, such as formamide and dimethyl sulfoxide, the length of the segments that are hybridizing, and the like. When it is contemplated that shorter nucleic acid segments will be used for hybridization, for example fragments between about 14 and about 100 nucleotides, salt and temperature preferred conditions for hybridization will include 1.2-1.8×HPB at 40-50° C.

[0068] Naturally, the present invention also encompasses DNA segments which are complementary, or essentially complementary, to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2. Nucleic acid sequences which are “complementary” are those which are capable of base-pairing according to the standard Watson-Crick complementarity rules. As used herein, the term “complementary sequences” means nucleic acid sequences which are substantially complementary, as may be assessed by the same nucleotide comparison set forth above, or as defined as being capable of hybridizing to the nucleic acid segment of SEQ ID NO: 2.

[0069] The nucleic acid segments of the present invention, regardless of the length of the coding sequence itself, may be combined with other DNA sequences, such as promoters, polyadenylation signals, additional restriction enzyme sites, multiple cloning sites, epitope tags, poly histidine regions, other coding segments, and the like, such that their overall length may vary considerably. It is therefore contemplated that a nucleic acid fragment of almost any length may be employed, with the total length preferably being limited by the ease of preparation and use in the intended recombinant DNA protocol.

[0070] Naturally, it will also be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular amino acid and nucleic acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 1 and 2. Recombinant vectors and isolated DNA segments may therefore variously include the HAS coding regions themselves, coding regions bearing selected alterations or modifications in the basic coding region, or they may encode larger polypeptides which nevertheless include HAS-coding regions or may encode biologically functional equivalent proteins or peptides which have variant amino acids sequences.

[0071] The DNA segments of the present invention encompass biologically functional equivalent HAS proteins and peptides. Such sequences may arise as a consequence of codon redundancy and functional equivalency which are known to occur naturally within nucleic acid sequences and the proteins thus encoded. Alternatively, functionally equivalent proteins or peptides may be created via the application of recombinant DNA technology, in which changes in the protein structure may be engineered, based on considerations of the properties of the amino acids being exchanged. Changes designed by man may be introduced through the application of site-directed mutagenesis techniques, e.g., to introduce improvements to the enzyme activity or to antigenicity of the HAS protein or to test HAS mutants in order to examine HA synthase activity at the molecular level.

[0072] Also, specific changes to the HAS coding sequence can result in the production of HA having a modified size distribution or structural configuration. One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the HAS coding sequence can be manipulated in a manner to produce an altered hyaluronate synthase which in turn is capable of producing hyaluronic acid having differing polymer sizes and/or functional capabilities. For example, the HAS coding sequence may be altered in such a manner that the hyaluronate synthase has an altered sugar substrate specificity so that the hyaluronate synthase creates a new hyaluronic acid-like polymer incorporating a different structure such as a previously unincorporated sugar or sugar derivative. This newly incorporated sugar could result in a modified hyaluronic acid having different functional properties, a hyaluronic acid having a smaller or larger polymer size/molecular weight, or both. As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art given the HAS coding sequences, changes and/or substitutions can be made to the HAS coding sequence such that these desired property and/or size modifications can be accomplished.

[0073] The term “modified structure” as used herein denotes a hyaluronic acid polymer containing a sugar or derivative not normally found in the naturally occurring HA polysaccharide. The term “modified size distribution” refer to the synthesis of hyaluronic acid molecules of a size distribution not normally found with the native enzyme; the engineered size could be much smaller or larger than normal.

[0074] Various hyaluronic acid products of differing size have application in the areas of drug delivery and the generation of an enzyme of altered structure can be combined with a hyaluronic acid of differing size. Applications in angiogenesis and wound healing are potentially large if hyaluronic acid polymers of about 20 monosaccharides can be made in good quantities. Another particular application for small hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides is in the stabilization of recombinant human proteins used for medical purposes. A major problem with such proteins is their clearance from the blood and a short biological half life. One present solution to this problem is to couple a small molecule shield that prevents the protein from being cleared from the circulation too rapidly. Very small molecular weight hyaluronic acid is well suited for this role and would be nonimmunogenic and biocompatible. Larger molecular weight hyaluronic acid attached to a drug or protein may be used to target the reticuloendothelial cell system which has endocytic receptors for hyaluronic acid.

[0075] One of ordinary skill in the art given this disclosure would appreciate that there are several ways in which the size distribution of the hyaluronic acid polymer made by the hyaluronate synthase could be regulated to give different sizes. First, the kinetic control of product size can be altered by decreasing temperature, decreasing time of enzyme action and by decreasing the concentration of one or both sugar nucleotide substrates. Decreasing any or all of these variables will give lower amounts and smaller sizes of hyaluronic acid product. The disadvantages of these approaches are that the yield of product will also be decreased and it may be difficult to achieve reproducibility from day to day or batch to batch.

[0076] Secondly, the alteration of the intrinsic ability of the enzyme to synthesize a large hyaluronic acid product. Changes to the protein can be engineered by recombinant DNA technology, including substitution, deletion and addition of specific amino acids (or even the introduction of prosthetic groups through metabolic processing). Such changes that result in an intrinsically slower enzyme could then allow more reproducible control of hyaluronic acid size by kinetic means. The final hyaluronic acid size distribution is determined by certain characteristics of the enzyme, that rely on particular amino acids in the sequence. Among the 20% of residues absolutely conserved between the streptococcal enzymes and the eukaryotic hyaluronate syntheses, there is a set of amino acids at unique positions that control or greatly influence the size of the hyaluronic acid polymer that the enzyme can make. Specific changes in any of these residues can produce a modified HAS that produces an HA product having a modified size distribution. Engineered changes to seHAS, spHAS, pmHAS, or cvHAS that decrease the intrinsic size of the hyaluronic acid that the enzyme can make before the hyaluronic acid is released, will provide powerful means to produce hyaluronic acid product of smaller or potentially larger size than the native enzyme.

[0077] Finally, larger molecular weight hyaluronic acid made be degraded with specific hyaluronidases to make lower molecular weight hyaluronic acid. This practice, however, is very difficult to achieve reproducibility and one must meticulously repurify the hyaluronic acid to remove the hyaluronidase and unwanted digestion products.

[0078] Structurally modified hyaluronic acid is no different conceptually than altering the size distribution of the hyaluronic acid product by changing particular amino acids in the desired HAS or the spHAS. Derivatives of UDP-GlcNAc, in which the N-acetyl group is missing (UDP-GlcN) or replaced with another chemically useful group, are expected to be particularly useful. The strong substrate specificity must rely on a particular subset of amino acids among the 20% that are conserved. Specific changes to one or more of these residues creates a functional synthase that interacts less specifically with one or more of the substrates than the native enzyme. This altered enzyme could then utilize alternate natural or special sugar nucleotides to incorporate sugar derivatives designed to allow different chemistries to be employed for the following purposes: (i) covalently coupling specific drugs, proteins, or toxins to the structurally modified hyaluronic acid for general or targeted drug delivery, radiological procedures, etc. (ii) covalently cross linking the hyaluronic acid itself or to other supports to achieve a gel, or other three dimensional biomaterial with stronger physical properties, and (iii) covalently linking hyaluronic acid to a surface to create a biocompatible film or monolayer.

[0079] The present invention relates to a novel HAS that produces HA. Using various molecular biology techniques, a gene for a new HAS was found in fowl cholera pathogen Type A Pasturella multocida. This new HAS from Pasturella multocida, or PmHAS, has been cloned and shown to be functional in other species of bacteria. The PmHAS protein polymerizes authentic HA polysaccharide.

[0080] The carbohydrate produced by a recombinant E. coli transformed with PmHAS is recognized by the cartilage HA-binding protein and is sensitive to HA lyase digestion. Both of these reagents are regarded by those of ordinary skill in the art as being specific for HA polysaccharide. Also, both UDP-GlcA and UDP-GlcNAc were required for HA synthesis in vitro. Azido-UDP-GlcA and azido-UDP-GlcNAc, but not azido-UDP-Glc, specifically photoincorporated into PmHAS. As in the case of streptococcal HasA and Xenopus DG42, it appears that one polypeptide species, PmHAS, transfers two distinct sugar groups to the nascent HA chain.

[0081] Many encapsulated Gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli, Neisseria meningitidis, and Hemophilus influenzae, possess clusters of genes responsible for capsule biosynthesis organized in operons. These operons often contain genes encoding (i) enzymes required for sugar nucleotide precursor synthesis, (ii) glycosyltransferases for polymerizing the exopolysaccharide, and (iii) proteins implicated in polysaccharide export. The Type A P. multocida HA capsule operon contains (i) a KfaA analog, (ii) a HA synthase, and (iii) a putative UDP-Glc dehydrogenase. The Tn916 elements in the P. multocida acapsular mutants H and L were not integrated directly in the HAS gene but rather were located in the KfaA homolog gene.

[0082] As the PmHAS exists in a locus of at least several genes essential for making polysaccharide, a lesion or defect in any one of the capsule genes could affect HA production and capsule formation in Pasturella. Thus, by disrupting an adjacent gene a vaccine could also be made. For example, if UDP-Glc dehydrogenase is removed or disrupted, no precursor sugar for HA synthase is available and HA cannot be made. Also, if Kfa or another transport associated gene is killed, then no surface HA is made by the microbe. Thus, the product of HA synthase in the natural Pasturella microbe, i.e. an HA capsule, could be stopped by (a) disrupting precursor formation, or (b) disrupting the polymerization machinery, or (c) disrupting the transport machinery.

[0083] At the amino acid level, PmHAS is not as similar to the other cloned HASs as one of ordinary skill in the art would expect. Two potential short motifs, DGS(S/T) at residues 477-480 and DSD at residues 527-529 of PmHAS are present in HasA. Another similar DGS-containing motif is found repeated at residues 196-198 of PmHAS. The DG of the first motif and the DSD are conserved in all HASs. However, several absolutely conserved motifs ((S/G)GPLXXY, GDDRXLTN, and LXQQXRWXKS(Y/F/W)(F/C)RE) found in all previously cloned HASs are absent from PmHAS. Instead, a variety of bacterial glycosyltransferases align more closely with the sequence in the central portion of the P. multocida HAS protein. These enzymes, which have been either shown or predicted to transfer GlcNAc, galactose, or GalNAc groups, are roughly one-third the size of the PmHAS and their amino acid termini sequences align together with the middle of the PmHAS polypeptide, residues 430-540.

[0084] Sections of the first 420 residues of PmHAS show some similarity to portions of the mammalian UDP-GalNAc: polypeptide GalNAc-transferase. These observations may be a reflection of a possible domain structure within PmHAS. The last approximate 340 residues of the PmHAS are not significantly similar to other entries in the sequence data bases. Therefore, the P. multocida HAS is unique and is most likely the prototype of an entire new class of HAS.

[0085] PmHAS is roughly twice the size of the streptococcal, viral, or vertebrate HASs—972 versus 417-588 residues, respectively. Furthermore, the hydropathy plots of PmHAS and the other known HASs are dissimilar. Utilizing the TMPRED program, which is readily known and available to those of ordinary skill in the art on the World Wide Web, PmHAS is predicted to have only two candidate transmembrane helices (centered on residues 170 and 510), and both termini of the protein may be located in the cytoplasm. Topologically, these assumptions imply that one-third of the P. multocida polypeptide (approximately 340 residues) is located outside of the cytoplasm. On the other hand, a different topology is predicted for the other classes of HAS.

[0086] Reporter enzyme fusion analysis of streptococcal HAS confirms that a different topological arrangement exists in this enzyme consisting of (i) two transmembrane helices near the amino acid terminus, (ii) a putative cytoplasmic domain, followed by (iii) three membrane-associated regions at the carboxyl half of the protein. The connecting loops between membrane-associated regions are rather short (4-10 residues); therefore, the vast majority of the polypeptide chain is probably not extracellularly exposed.

[0087] The following detailed experimental steps and discussion of results, confirms that the present invention relates to a novel and unique PmHAS.

[0088] 1. Molecular Cloning of PmHAS

[0089] Tn916 insertional mutagenesis and probe generation was first completed. Tn916 was used to disrupt and to tag the P. multocida HA biosynthesis locus. The Tn element on a nonreplicating plasmid, pAM150 was introduced into a wild-type encapsulated P. multocida strain (ATCC number 15742) by electroporation. Altered colony morphology was initially screened by visual examination with oblique lighting. The Wild-type strain forms large mucoid (“wet” appearance) colonies that appear iridescent (red and green coloration). Smaller, “drier” colonies lacking iridescence were chosen and streaked out. India ink staining and light microscopy were used as a secondary screen to assess the state of encapsulation. The position of the Tn elements in the mutant chromosome was mapped by Southern analysis.

[0090] The DNA sequences at the Tn-disrupted sites from several independently selected mutants were obtained by direct dideoxy sequence analysis of tagged chromosomal DNA. Briefly, a chimeric DNA fragment consisting of a 12-kb portion of the Tn916 element and a short region of the P. multocida DNA generated by HhaI digestion of mutant chromosomal DNA was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis (all of the wild type HhaI genomic fragments are less than or equal to 7 kb). The chimeric fragment served as the template in cycle sequencing reactions using ³³P terminators and a Tn916 right arm terminus primer (5′-GACCTTGATAAAGTGTGATAAGTCC-3′). The sequence data were used to design PCR primers. Gel-purified PCR products were labeled with digoxigenin utilizing the High Prime system manufactured by Boehringer Mannheim and well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.

[0091] The next step was the isolation of a functional HAS locus. A λ library of Sau3A partially digested wild type DNA was made using BamHI-cleaved λZap Express vector system produced by Stratagene. The plaque lifts were screened by hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled PCR product. Escherichia coli XLI-Blue MRF' was co-infected with individual purified positive λ clones and ExAssist helper phage to yield phagemids. The resulting phagemids were transfected into E. coli XLOLR cells to recover the plasmids.

[0092] The plasmids were transformed into a host more suitable for HA polysaccharide production, E. coli K5 (strain Bi8337-41). This strain produces UDP-GlcA, a required substrate for HA biosynthesis that is not found at significant levels in most laboratory strains. Additionally, K5 possesses many other genes essential for capsular polysaccharide transport in E. coli. Another host employed for expression studies was E. coli EV5, an acapsular derivative of a K1 strain which produces a polysialic acid capsule and which also possesses all the same general capsular polysaccharide transport machinery as K5, but does not have high levels of UDP-Glc dehydrogenase.

[0093] Cultures of the E. coli transformants with the candidate plasmids grown in completely defined medium were tested for HA polysaccharide production as described previously except that the cell pellets were extracted with 8 M urea, 0.01% SDS at 95 degrees Celsius for 2 minutes. The HA test assay produced by Pharmacia Biotech Inc., which is well known by those of ordinary skill in the art, employs a specific HA-binding protein to detect HA at concentrations greater than or equal to 0.1 μg/ml. Multiple determinations of HA levels were averaged. The HA concentration in bacterial cultures was normalized for differences in cell number by measuring the A₆₀₀ value and presenting the data as μg HA/ml/A₆₀₀ of bacteria. One plasmid, pPm7A, with a 5.8 kb insert conferred E. coli K5 with the ability to produce HA; no HA was produced by cells with vector plasmid alone. A truncated derivative of pPm7A containing an approximately 3.3 kb insert, called pPmΔ6e, could direct the biosynthesis of HA when transformed into E. coli K5. Therefore, the sequence of both strands of the pPm7A plasmid corresponding to the pPmΔ6e DNA was determined. A single complete 972-residue ORF, which we called PmHAS, was found and is shown in SEQ. ID No. 1. The corresponding nucleotide sequence is shown in SEQ.ID No. 2.

[0094] Expression of recombinant P. multocida HAS was then undertaken. The PmHAS ORF in the pPm7A insert was amplified by 13 cycles of PCR with Taq polymerase and primers corresponding to the sequence near the deduced amino and carboxyl termini (codons in capital letters: sense, 5′-gcgaattcaaaggacagaaaATGAAcACATTATCACAAG-3′, and anitsense, 5′-gggaattctgcagttaTAGAGTTATACTATTAATAATGAAC-3′; start and stop codons, respectively, in bold). Codon 2 (T→C) was altered (italic lowercase letter) to increase protein production in E. coli. The primers also contained EcoRI and PstI restriction sites (underlined letters) to facilitate cloning into the expression plasmid pKK223-3 (tac promoter; Pharmacia). The resulting recombinant construct, pPmHAS, was transformed into E. coli SURE cells (Stratagene) and this strain was used as the source of membrane preparations for in vitro HAS assays. Log phase cultures(LB broth, 30 degrees Celsius) were induced with 0.5 mM isopropylthiogalactoside for 3 hours before harvest. The plasmid was also transformed into E. coli K5; the resulting strain was examined for the presence of capsule by light microscopy and buoyant density centrifugation. The K5 bacterial cultures were not induced routinely because isopropylthiogalactopyranoside addition did not increase HA levels in LB or defined medium significantly.

[0095] Photoaffinity labeling of the native P. multocida HAS was then undertaken. The radiolabeled UDP sugar analogs, [³²P]azido-UDP-GlcA (3 mCi/μMol) and [³²P]azido-UDP-GlcNAc (2.5 mCi/μMol), were prepared and purified as described in the literature and known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Membrane preparations from P. multocida wild type in 50 mM Tris, 20 mM MgCl₂, pH 7, were incubated with either probe (final concentration, 20 μM) for 30 seconds on ice before irradiation with ultraviolet light (254 nm, 90 seconds). The proteins were precipitated with 5% trichloroacetic acid before SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis. No radiolabel was incorporated if the irradiation step was omitted. As a specificity control, 10-fold molar excess of the normal UDP sugar was co-incubated with the probe and membranes. [³²P]azido-UDP-Glc (3 mCi/μMol) was also used as another control.

[0096] Approximately 8×10⁴ Tn-containing transformants produced by several rounds of mutagenesis were screened for differences in colony morphology. By light spectroscopy with India Ink, the cells from small noniridescent colonies (n=4) possessed no detectable capsule (acapsular), whereas the cells from medium-sized iridescent colonies (n=8) appeared to have a capsule of about 10-25% of the diameter of the wild type (microcapsular). Two of the acapsular mutants, named H and L, which had Tn elements that mapped to the same HindIII or BstXI genomic fragments reverted to wild-type colony morphology at rates of approximately 10⁻³. The Tn element in each revertant had excised from the original position and reinserted at different, new locations as judged by Southern analysis; on the other hand, all acapsular subclones retained the Tn element at the original location. No significant HAS activity was detected in membrane preparations from mutant H cells, whereas substantial HAS activity was obtained from wild-type wild type cells (less than or equal to 0.7 versus 120 pmol transfer GlcA/mg protein/h, respectively). These findings suggest that the Tn elements in mutants H and L were indeed responsible for disrupting the HA biosynthesis locus.

[0097] In order to bridge the gap between the Tn insertion sites of two acapsular mutants, PCR using the mutant L chromosomal DNA template was performed with a primer derived from sequence at the mutant H disruption site, PmHF (5′-CTCCAGCTGTAAATTAGAGATAAAG-3′), and a primer corresponding to the left terminus of Tn916, TnL2 (5′-GCACATAGAATAAGGCTTTACGAGC-3′). A specific approximately 1 kb PCR product was obtained; alternatively, no product was formed if PmHR (inverse complement of PmHF) or the Tn916 right arm primer were substituted. The PCR product was used as a hybridization probe to obtain a functional copy of the P. multocida HAS.

[0098] Six positively hybridizing plaques were found after screening approximately 10⁴ plaques, and these phage were converted into plasmids. One plasmid, pPm7A, was found that could direct E. coli K5 to produce HA in vivo (20 μg HA/ml/A₆₀₀ of bacteria). E. coli K5 with control plasmids did not produce HA (less than or equal to 0.05 μg HA/ml/A₆₀₀). E. coli XLOLR or E. coli EV5 cells (which lack UDP-Glc dehydrogenase activity) do not produce HA even if they contain the pPm7A plasmid (less than or equal to 0.05 μg HA/ml/A₆₀₀). This genetic evidence implies that the insert of pPm7A does not encode a functional UDP-Glc dehydrogenase enzyme.

[0099] A truncated derivative of the pPm7A plasmid with the smallest insert capable of directing HA biosynthesis (85 μg HA/ml/A₆₀₀ of K5 bacteria), pPmΔ6e, contained a single complete ORF encoding a 972 residue protein as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1. No obvious promoter is present in SEQ ID NO. 1 but there is a predicted ribosome binding site labeled in bold “centered on nucleotides −10 to −7 and the two putative transmembrane regions predicted by TMPRED are underlined (Residues 162-182, and 503-522). The PmHAS of SEQ ID NO. 1 is twice as large as streptococcal HasA. This protein is the HA synthase from P. multocida, PmHAS. The predicted M_(r) is 111,923 and the calculated isoelectric point is 6.84. SEQ.ID No. 2 is the nucleotide sequence for PmHAS.

[0100] This PmHAS was used as the query in BLASTP searches of the protein sequence data base. The central portion of PmHAS (residues 436-536) is most homologous to bacterial glycosyltransferases from a wide variety of genera, including Streptococcus, Vibrio, Neisseria, and Staphylococcus, that form exopolysaccharides or the carbohydrate portions of lipopolysaccharides (smallest sum probabilities, 10⁻²²-10⁻¹⁰, as shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 1 graphically depicts the sequence alignment of P. multocida HAS and other glycosyltransferases. The MULTALIN alignment illustrates that the central region of the PmHAS (residues 436-536) is most similar to the amino-terminal portions of various enzymes that produce other exopolysaccharides (Streptococcus thermophilus EpsI; Type 14 S. pneumoniae Cps14J) or the carbohydrate moiety of lipopolysaccharides (H. Influenzae LgtD homology). Only a few of the possible examples are shown in FIG. 1. S. pyogenes HasA (residues 61-168) has limited similarity to this depicted region of PmHAS.

[0101] The most notable sequence similarities are the DGSTD and DXDD motifs. Unexpectedly, there was no significant overall similarity of PmHAS to the streptococcal, viral, or vertebrate HASs with HASA having the smallest sum probability of 0.33. Only one short region of streptococcal HasA aligns with PmHAS in a convincing manner and is shown in FIG. 1.

[0102] A few segments of the first half of PmHAS are also similar to portions of the mammalian UDP-GalNAc:polypeptide GalNAc-transferase, an enzyme that initiates O-glycosylation of mucin-type proteins with the smallest sum probability being approximately 10⁻³, FIG. 2. As shown in FIG. 2, the sequence alignment of residues 342-383 of PmHAS are most similar to residues 362-404 of the mammalian UDP-GalNAc:polypeptide GalNAc-transferase. For both FIGS. 1 and 2, the identical residues are bold and underlined, and the consensus symbols are: !, either I or V; #, any one of N, D, E, or Q; %, either F or Y. The clusters of acidic residues are well conserved throughout the sequences.

[0103] The partial ORF (27 residues) downstream of PmHAS is very similar to the amino terminus of several UDP-Glc dehydrogenases from bacteria including E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Streptococcus pneumoniae (67-74% identity). The severe truncation in the original pPm7A clone would be expected to result in complete loss of dehydrogenase activity. The other ORF (623 residues) upstream of PmHAS is very homologous to the E. coli K5 KfaA protein with a smallest sum probability of 10⁻⁵², a protein putatively involved in the transport of capsular polysaccharide out of the cell.

[0104] The predicted size of 972 residues (112 kDa) for PmHAS was confirmed by photoaffinity labeling of membrane preparations from P. multocida wild type. Both [³²P]azido-UDP-GlcA and [³²P]azido-UDP-GlcNAc probes photoincorporated into an approximately 110 kDa protein in an UV-dependent manner. FIG. 3 is a photoaffinity labeling of the PmHAS with UDP-sugar analogs. [³²P]azido-UDP-GlcA and [³²P]azido-UDP-GlcNAc were incubated with membrane preparations (45 μg of protein) isolated from wild-type P. multocida and irradiated with UV light. Autoradiograms (5 day exposures) of 10% SDS-PAGE gels are shown in FIG. 3. Both probes photolabel an approximately 110 kDa protein in an UV-dependent manner (the “−” lanes). In order to assess the specificity of photoincorporation, a parallel sample was treated identically except that the reaction mixtures included a 10-fold excess of unlabeled competitor (UDP-GlcNAc or UDP-GlcA, respectively; marked the “+” lanes). The band intensities are reduced in comparison to the “−” lanes. The standards are marked in kDa.

[0105] Competition with the corresponding unlabeled natural UDP-sugar precursors lowered the extent of probe photoincorporation. In parallel experiments, [³²P]azido-UDP-Glc, an analog of the normal HA precursors, did not label this 110 kDa protein. Furthermore, membranes derived from Tn mutants had either no or very low amounts of azido-UDP-GlcA photoincorporation into this protein. As shown in FIG. 4, membrane preparations (60 μg of protein) from wild-type (W) or various acapsular Tn mutants (A, G, or H) were photolabeled with [³²P]azido-UDP-GlcA. The region of the autoradiogram in the vicinity of the approximate 110 kDa protein is shown in FIG. 4. No photoincorporation is seen in the A and G samples. The small extent of photolabelling in the H sample is due to the low rate of reversion observed with this particular mutant. The size of the photoaffinity labeled protein in the W sample corresponds well to the predicted M_(r) of the cloned PmHAS ORF.

[0106] Membranes derived from E. coli SURE cells containing the pPmHAS plasmid, but not samples from cells with the vector pKK223-3 alone, synthesized HA in vitro when supplied with both UDP-GlcA and UDP-GlcNAc (25 versus less than or equal to 1.5 pMol GlcA transfer/mg protein/hour, respectively). No incorporation of [¹⁴C]GlcA was observed if UDP-GlcNAc was omitted or if divalent metal ions were chelated with EDTA. The HAS activity derived from recombinant HAS was similar to the enzyme obtained from wild-type P. multocida membranes because Mn²⁺ stimulated at least 10-fold more activity than Mg²⁺.

[0107] Cultures of recombinant E. Coli were also tested for the presence of HA polysaccharide with a radiometric assay utilizing labeled HA-binding protein. E. coli K5 with pPmHAS produced 460 μg HA/ml/A₆₀₀. K5 cells with pKK223-3 vector alone did not produce HA (less than or equal to 0.05 μg HA/ml/A₆₀₀. For comparison, wild-type P. multocida wild type grown in the same media produced 1,100 μg HA/ml/A₆₀₀ . E. coli K5 with pPmHAS produced such high levels of HA that the cells became encapsulated. As shown in FIG. 5, Panel A, the photomicrographs of recombinant E. coli with India ink staining (1,000× magnification) reveals that E. coli K5 cells with pPmHAS produce a substantial capsule that appears as a white halo around the cells.

[0108] The radius of the capsule of the recombinant strain was approximately 0.2-0.5 μm (assuming a bacterial cell width of 0.5 μm). This capsule could be removed by treatment with either ovine testicular hyaluronidase or Streptomyces HA lyase. As shown in FIG. 5, Panel B, the capsular material was removed from the E. coli K5(pPmHAS) cells by brief treatment with Streptomyces HA lyase. Thus, PmHAS directs polymerization of the HA polysaccharide.

[0109] Neither the native K5 host strain nor transformants containing pKK223-3 vector possessed a readily observable capsule as determined by light spectroscopy. K5 cells with pPmHAS were also deemed encapsulated by buoyant density centrifugation. The recombinant cells floated on top of the 58% Percoll cushion, whereas the vector control cells or hyaluronidase-treated recombinant cells pelleted through the Percoll cushion.

[0110] The p/PmHAS plasmid in E. coli K5 is the first generation system for making recombinant HA with PmHAS; other optimized vectors and/or hosts may give greater yields, and these other optimized vectors and/or hosts are herein contemplated for use with the present invention. One of ordinary skill in the art, given this disclosure, would be capable of optimizing such vectors and/or hosts.

[0111] 2. Enzymological Characterization of PmHAS

[0112] Protein was determined by the Coomassie dye-binding assay utilizing a bovine serum albumin standard. P. multocida wild type (American Type Culture Collection 15742), a highly virulent turkey strain that forms very mucoid colonies, was maintained on brain/heart infusion medium under aerobic conditions at 37 degrees Celsius. An acapsular mutant of the strain which formed smaller, “drier” colonies, named TnA, was generated by a newly described Tn916 insertational mutagenesis method described herein.

[0113] Total membranes from P. multocida were prepared by a modification of the method for producing HA synthase from E. coli with recombinant plasmids containing hasA. Cells were grown with vigorous shaking to mid-log phase (0.4-0.8 A₆₀₀) and then ovine testicular hyaluronidase (Sigma Type V, 20 units/mL final) was added to remove the capsule. After 40 min., the cells were chilled on ice and harvested by centrifugation (2000×g for 15 min). The cells were washed twice PBS by repeated suspension and centrifugation, and the cell pellet could be stored at −80 degrees Celsius. All of the following steps were performed on ice unless noted otherwise.

[0114] The cells were resuspended by pipetting in {fraction (1/400)} the original culture volume of 20% sucrose and 30 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing the protease inhibitors pepstatin and leupeptin. Cell lysis was carried out by using lysozyme digestion (addition of {fraction (1/10)} the suspended volume of 4 mg/mL enzyme in 0.1 M EDTA, 40-min incubation) followed by ultrasonic disruption (power setting 3, three cycles of 30 s on/off; Heat Systems W-380 with microprobe). Before the ultrasonification step, sodium thioglycolate was added to the mixture (0.1 mM final concentration) following the addition of phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride. In all the remaining manipulations, the PBS also contained freshly added thioglycolate at the same concentration.

[0115] The lysate was treated with Dnase and Rnase (1 μg/mL each, 10 min at 4 degrees Celsius) and the cellular debris was removed by low-speed centrifugation (10000×g for 1 hour). The supernatant fraction was diluted 6-fold with PBS and the membrane fraction was harvested by ultracentrifugation (100000×g for 1 hour). The pellet was washed twice by repeated suspension in PBS containing 10 mM MgCl₂ followed by ultracentrifugation. For generating membrane preparations used in metal specificity studies, MgCl₂ was omitted and replaced with 0.2 mM EDTA during the wash steps. Membrane preparations were suspended in 50 mM Tris, pH 7, and 0.1 mM thioglycolate, at a concentration of 1-3 mg/mL protein and stored at −80 degrees Celsius.

[0116] HA synthase activity was routinely detected by incorporation of the radiolabel derived from the sugar nucleotide precursor UDP-[¹⁴C]GlcA (0.27 Ci/mmol, ICN), into higher molecular weight products. The various assay buffers, described in the figure legends, also contained 0.3 mM DTT. Assays (100 μL final volume were initiated by addition of membranes to the reaction mixture and incubation at 37 degrees Celsius. After 1 hour, the reactions were terminated by addition of SDS (2% final) and mixing. For the kinetic studies, the product and precursors were separated by descending paper chromatography (Whatman 3M with 65:35 ethanol/1 M ammonium acetate, pH 5.5). The HA polysaccharide at the origin of the paper chromatogram was eluted with water before liquid scintillation counting. The assays were typically performed under conditions in which no more than 5% of the precursors were consumed by limiting amounts of enzyme.

[0117] Controls to verify incorporation into authentic HA included omission of the required second sugar nucleotide precursor or digestion using the specific hyaluronidase from Streptomyces hyalurolyticus. Gel-filtration chromatography with Sephacryl S-200 (Pharmacia) in PBS was used to assess the molecular weight of the radiolabeled polymer formed in vitro under optimized assay conditions. These samples were treated as for paper chromatography except that, after termination, they were heated at 95 degrees Celsius for 2 minutes and clarified by centrifugation (15000×g for 7 minutes) before application to the column.

[0118] EDTA (0.2 mM) was used to chelate any metal ions present in assay mixtures to verify metal dependence of the HAS activity. Various divalent metals, including Mg, Mn, Cu, Co, and Ni, were tested as their chloride salts. The K_(m) values of the substrates were estimated by titration of one sugar nucleotide concentration while holding the other radiolabeled precursor at a constant and saturating concentration. For these studies, UDP-[³H]GlcNAc (30 Ci/mmol, NEN) was employed as well as the UDP-[¹⁴C]GlcA precursor.

[0119]P. multocida cells produce a readily visible extracellular HA capsule, and since the streptococcal HasA is a transmembrane protein, membrane preparations of the fowl cholera pathogen were tested. In early trials, crude membrane fractions derived from ultrasonication alone possessed very low levels if UDP-GlcNAc-dependent UDP-[¹⁴C]GlcA incorporating into HA [approximately 0.2 pmol of GlcA transfer (μg of proteins)⁻¹h⁻¹] when assayed under conditions similar to those for measuring streptococcal HAS activity. The enzyme from E. coli with the recombinant hasA plasmid was also recalcitrant to isolation at first. These results were in contrast to the easily detectable amounts obtained from Streptococcus by similar methods.

[0120] An alternative preparation protocol using ice-cold lysozyme treatment in the presence of protease inhibitors in conjunction with ultrasonication allowed the substantial recovery of HAS activity from both species of Gram-negative bacteria. Specific activities of 5-10 pmol of GlcA transfer (μg of protein)⁻¹h⁻¹ were routinely obtained for crude membranes of wild-type P. multocida with the new method. In the absence of UDP-GlcNAc, virtually no radioactivity (less than 1% of identical assay with both sugar precursors) from UDP-[¹⁴C]GlcA was incorporated into higher molecular weight material. Membranes prepared from the acapsular mutant, TnA, posssessed no detectable HAS activity when supplemented with both sugar nucleotide precursors. Gel-filtration analysis using a Sephacryl S-200 column indicates that the molecular mass of the majority of the ¹⁴C-labeled product synthesized in vitro is ≧8×10⁴ Da since the material elutes in the void volume; such a value corresponds to a HA molecule composed of at least 400 monomers. This product is also sensitive to Streptomyces hyaluronidase digestion but resistant to Pronase treatment.

[0121] The parameters of the HAS assay were varied to maximize incorporation of UDP-sugars into polysaccharide by P. multocida membranes. Streptococcal HasA requires Mg²⁺ and therefore this metal ion was included in the initial assays of P. multocida membranes. The P. multocida HAS was relatively active from pH 6.5 to 8.6 in Tris-type buffers with an optimum at pH 7, FIG. 7. FIG. 7 depicts the pH dependence of P. multocida HAS activity. The incorporation of [¹⁴C]GlcA into HA polysaccharide catalyzed by membranes (38 μg of protein) was measured in reactions buffered at various pH values (50 mM Tris/2-(N-(morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid, bis-Tris/HCl, or tris/Hcl; no major buffer ion-specific effects were noted). The incubation mixture also contained 20 mM MgCl₂, 120 μM UDP-GlcA (4.5×10⁴ dpm/assay), and 300 μM UDP-GlcNAc. The incorporation of the assay using the optimal buffer, pH 7 Tris, was set to 100% activity. A broad pH optimum around neutrality was observed.

[0122] The HAS activity was linear with respect to the incubation time at neutral pH for at least 1 hour. The P. multocida enzyme was apparently less active at higher ionic strengths because the addition of 100 mM NaCl to the reaction containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7, and 20 mM MgCl₂ reduced sugar incorporation by approximately 50%.

[0123] The metal ion specificity of the P. multocida HAS was assessed at pH 7, FIG. 8. FIG. 8 depicts metal dependence of HAS activity. The production of HA was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of Mg (circles) or Mn (squares) ion. The membranes (46 μg of protein), prewashed with 0.2 mM EDTA were incubated in a mixture of the metal ion in 50 mM Tris, pH 7, 120 μM UDP-GlcA (4.5×10⁴ dpm/assay), and 300 μM UDP-GlcNAc for 1 hour. The background with no metal present (22 dpm) was subtracted from each point. Mn is more effective than Mg.

[0124] Under metal-free conditions in the presence of EDTA, no incorporation of radiolabeled precursor into polysaccharide was detectable (<0.5% of maximal signal). Mn²⁺ gave the highest incorporation rates at the lowest ion concentrations for the tested metals (mg, Mn, Co, Cu, and Ni). Mg²⁺ gave about 50% of the Mn²⁺ stimulation but at 10-fold higher concentrations. Co²⁺ or Ni²⁺ at 10 mM supported lower levels of activity (20% or 9%, respectively, of 1 mM Mn²⁺ assays), but membranes supplied with 10 mM Cu²⁺ were inactive. Indeed, mixing 10 mM Cu²⁺ and 20 mM Mg²⁺ with the membrane preparation resulted in almost no incorporation of label into polysaccharide (<0.8% of Mg only value).

[0125] Initial characterization of the P. multocida HAS was performed in the presence of Mg²⁺. The binding affinity of the enzyme for its sugar nucleotide precursors was assessed by measuring the apparent K_(M) value. Incorporation of [¹⁴C]GlcA or [³H]GlcNAc into polysaccharide was monitored at varied concentrations of UDP-GlcNAc or UDP-GlcA, respectively, FIGS. 9 and 10, respectively.

[0126]FIG. 9 depicts HAS activity dependence on UDP-GlcNAc concentration. Membranes (20 μg of protein) were incubated with increasing concentrations of UDP-GlcNAc in buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7, 20 mM MgCl₂, and 800 μM UDP-GlcA (1.4×10⁵ dpm of ¹⁴C) for 1 hour. The background radioactivity (identical assay but no added UDP-GlcNAc) was subtracted from each point. The highest specific incorporation rate into HA (average approximately 780 dpm/hour) in the titration was defined a V_(max) for normalization to 100%.

[0127]FIG. 10 depicts HAS activity dependence on UDP-GlcA concentration. In experiments parallel to those described in FIG. 9, increasing amounts of UDP-GlcA were incubated with 1 mM UDP-GlcNAc (2.7×10⁵ dpm of ³H) under the same general buffer and assay conditions. The background radioactivity (assay with no added UDP-GlcA) was subtracted from each point. The data is presented as in FIG. 9. Specific incorporation at V_(max) averaged approximately 730 dpm/hour.

[0128] In Mg²⁺ containing buffers, the apparent K_(M) values ˜20 μM for UDP-GlcA and ˜75 μM for UDP-GlcNAc were determined utilizing Hanes-Woolf plots ([S]/v versus [S]) of the titration data shown in FIG. 11. FIG. 11 depicts the Hanes-Woolf plot estimation of V_(max) and K_(M). The specific incorporation data used to generate FIG. 9 (squares) and FIG. 10 (circles) were graphed as [S]/v versus [S]. The parallel slopes, which correspond to 1/V_(max), indicate that the maximal velocities for the sugar nucleotide precursors were equivalent. The x-axis intercept, which signifies −K_(M), yielded K_(M) values of 75 and 20 μM for UDP-GlcNAc and UDP-GlcA, respectively.

[0129] The V_(max) values for both sugars were the same because the slopes were equivalent. In comparison to the results from assays with Mg²⁺, the K_(M) value for UDP-GlcNAc was increased by about 25-50% to ˜105 μM and the V_(max) increased by a factor of 2-3 fold in the presence of Mn²⁺. These values are represented in Table I. TABLE I membrane wash assay ion K_(M)(μM) V_(max)(pmol/h) Mg Mg 75 ± 5  114 ± 36 EDTA Mg 55 ± 25 98 ± 1 EDTA Mn 105 ± 5  380 ± 70

[0130] As stated previously, the HA capsules of pathogens P. multocida and S. pyogenes are virulence factors that aid the evasion of host defenses. The HA synthase enzyme from either bacterial source utilizes UDP-sugars, but they possess somewhat different kinetic optima with respect to pH and metal ion dependence and K_(M) values. Both enzymes are most active at pH 7; however, the PmHAS functions better on the alkaline side of the pH optimum up to at least pH 8.6. On the other hand, the spHAS reportedly displays more activity at slightly acidic pH and is relatively inactive above pH 7.4. The P. multocida enzymes utilizes Mn²⁺ more efficiently than Mg²⁺ under the in vitro assay conditions. The PmHAS binds the UDP-sugars more tightly than streptococcal HasA. The measured K_(M) values for the PmHAS in crude membranes are about 2-3 fold lower for each substrate than those obtained from the HAS found in streptococcal membranes.

[0131] 3. Use of the PmHAS for Vaccinations

[0132] The DNA sequence of PmHAS may also be used to generate potential attenuated vaccine strains of P. multocida bacteria after knocking out the normal microbial gene by homologous recombination with a disrupted version. Additionally, the PmHAS DNA sequence allows for the generation of diagnostic bacterial typing probes for related P. multocida types that are agricultural pathogens of fowl, cattle, sheep and swine.

[0133] There are at least five different types of the bacterial pathogen P. multocida with distinct capsule antigens. Fowl cholera or avian pasteurellosis, which is mostly caused by Type A strains, is a widespread, economically damaging disease in commercial poultry. An acute outbreak of fowl cholera is usually detected only when the birds suddenly collapse as symptoms often appear just a few hours prior to death. Although little is known about the molecular basis for the virulence of P. multocida, apparently one of the pathogen's virulent strains possesses a polysaccharide capsule, and their colonies display a mucoid or “wet” morphology on agar plates. White blood cells have difficulty engulfing and inactivating the bacteria and the complement complex cannot contact the bacterial membrane to cause lysis. The major capsule component of the Carter Type A P. multocida, which is responsible for perhaps 90-95% of fowl cholera disease, is the polysaccharide HA and HA does not illicit an immune response in virtually all members of the Animal Kingdom. Even if an immune response did occur, it would present a problem for the bird because of the repercussions of autoimmune reactions. Type A P. multocida strains are also prominent causes of swine and bovine pneumatic pasteurellosis, and shipping fever in cattle.

[0134] Two other P. multocida capsular types, Type D and Type F, are less well studied but are prevalent pathogens in North America. Type F is isolated from about 5-10% of fowl cholera cases. Type D is also a cause of pneumonia in cattle, sheep, and swine. Isolates from the pneumonic lesions of these domestic animals were analyzed from capsule type and about 25-40% were Type D and the rest were Type A. Additionally, the Type D strain is intimately involved in swine atrophic rhinitis. The capsules of these Type D and Type F microbes are composed of different polysaccharides with unknown structures, but they are apparently similar to chondroitan, a prevalent molecule on the vertebrate body. The general backbone structure of chondroitan, repeating (β1,4)GlcA(β1,3)GalNAc units, is very similar to HA. It is not surprising, therefore, that the Type D and F polysaccharides are poorly immunogenic.

[0135] Typically, the antibodies against bacterial surface components derived from previous infections (or vaccinations) are an important means for white blood cells to adhere to a bacterium during phagocytosis; this feature usually makes the immune response extremely effective in fighting disease. Thus, the presence of capsules composed of non-immunogenic polymers, such as HA or chondroitan-like sugars, compromise the efficiency of all phases of the host defenses. Streptococcus pyogenes, a human pathogen, also employs a HA capsule as molecular “mimicry” to protect itself from host defenses. Acapsular S. pyogenes mutants cannot survive in blood and are 100 fold less virulent than the wild-type in mice. Many virulent E. coli strains possess capsules comprised of other polysaccharides that mimic host molecules and aid the cell in eluding the immune system. The capsules of all these pathogenic bacteria are clever evolutionary adaptations that must be overcome in order to defeat the disease.

[0136] Previous investigations have focused on the capsule of P. multocida and its role in virulence. As for Type A fowl strains, wild-type encapsulated bacteria and various acapsular forms were tested for their ability to survive challenges by isolated host defenses (white blood cells and complement) or to cause infection and death of live fowl. The acapsular bacteria were typically: (a) spontaneously arising mutants; (b) chemically-induced mutants; or (c) wild-type bacteria treated with hyaluronidase [HAase], a specific HA-degrading enzyme. In general, capsule-deficient Type A bacteria were more readily killed by isolated host defenses in vitro.

[0137] Turkey serum killed both mutant and HAase-treated cells, while the wild-type cells multiplied. The complement system was involved, since the killing ability was lost by heat or calcium-chelator treatment of the serum prior to incubation with bacteria. That encapsulated wild-type cells consume or reduce the level of complement in sera without inactivation indicates that the complex binds to but cannot lyse the cells. Turkey macrophages and heterophils phagocytose both acapsular variants and HAase-treated cells more avidly than wild-type cells.

[0138] In live animal testing, the spontaneous mutants were 10³ to 10⁵-fold less virulent than the corresponding wild-type parent strain, as assessed by LD₅₀ (i.e. the lethal does for 50% of the tested animals). This enormous difference shows the importance of the capsule in pathogenesis by Type A strains. The fate of the bacteria in live turkeys also depended on encapsulation; only wild-type cells survived in the liver. Fifteen to twenty-four hours after injection, wild-type cells were found in the blood at a 10⁵-fold higher concentration than the unencapsulated mutants. Another role for the HA capsule is adhesion and colonization. Certain cells in the vertebrate body possess specific HA-binding proteins on their surface; potentially the bacteria could adhere to the host via this protein/HA interaction.

[0139] Likewise, the capsules of Type D and Type F P. multocida are implicated as virulence factors that confer the microbes with resistance to phagocytosis. When Type D or F cells are treated with chondroitinase, the microbes lose their capsule and are more readily phagocytosed in vitro. Furthermore, these polymers are not strongly immunogenic. From in vivo testing, encapsulated Type D strains produced more severe nasal lesions in swine and had a much lower LD₅₀ in mice than unencapsulated variants (10² vs. 10⁷⁻⁸ cells, respectively).

[0140] In the case of the Type A and D mutants studied above, however, the genetic nature of their defects were not known, and there was no facile method for mapping the mutations. Particularly with chemical mutagenesis, there is likely to be more than one mutation in any given “mutant”. Furthermore, it was not shown that HA production was completely eradicated in the “acapsular” mutants; thin capsules not detectable by colony morphology, light microscopy or chemical test could still exist. More sensitive radiometric and buoyant density assays are required for detection of even small capsules. Utilizing these new methods, it has been determined that one strain used in several virulence assays and reported as acapsular, actually possesses a very thin HA capsule. Therefore, it is important to determine the effects from a truly acapsular strain.

[0141] Historically, the genes involved in P. multocida capsule production were not known. Several genes residing in the capsule locus of another bacterium in a related genus, Haemophilus influenzae, were mapped and sequenced, but the molecular details of the biosynthetic apparatus are not available. Even in E. coli a very well studied Gram-negative organism, the exact role of every putative gene product is not well understood, although the loci of capsule formation has been thoroughly mapped and the DNA sequences obtained for several capsule types.

[0142] The cloning and sequencing of the HA biosynthesis locus of Streptococcus pyogenes has been reported. This microbe, like P. multocida, utilizes a HA capsule to evade human defenses. The HA operon contains three genes arranged in tandem on an approximately 4 kb of DNA. The first gene, hasA, encodes the 45.1 kDa HA synthase that polymerizes the two sugar nucleotide precursors, UDP-GlcA and UDP-GlcNAc, to form the HA polysaccharide. The second gene, hasB, encodes a 45.5 kDa UDP-glucose dehydrogenase which converts UDP-glucose (UDP-Glc) into UDP-GlcA for HA biosynthesis. The third gene, hasC, encodes a 34 kDa UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase which forms UDP-Glc from UTP and glucose-1-phosphate. There is an auxiliary enzyme dedicated to forming UDP-sugars for capsule biosynthesis; another “housekeeping” gene residing elsewhere in the chromosome supplies UDP-Glc for the bacterium's normal metabolic pathways. UDP-GlcNAc is present in all eubacteria due to its role in cell wall synthesis. Therefore, the HA synthase and dehydrogenase are the only two exogenous proteins needed to direct HA polysaccharide synthesis in heterologous bacteria. S. pyogenes HA synthase, which is predicted to be a membrane protein with transmembrane helices, probably both polymerizes HA and transports the growing polysaccharide chain to the outside of the cell.

[0143] As previously discussed above, the gene responsible for capsule production of HA in P. multocida, has been isolated and sequenced. (See e.g. SEQ. ID Nos. 1 and 2.) This gene is disclosed and claimed as part of the present invention. As also discussed previously, the polymers of the P. multocida capsules pose a dilemma for host defenses. Using the PmHAS gene sequence information, recombinantly produced P. multocida strains having the HA synthesis gene “knocked out” will disrupt the bacterial capsular synthesis of P. multocida. Using the “knocked out” strain as a vaccine will allow the host organism to fend off challenges by the pathogen in the field.

[0144] As discussed above, Tn916, a versatile and proven mutagen, inserts into the chromosome of P. multocida at various apparently quasi-random locations. The Tn was introduced into the cells on a “suicide” plasmid—i.e. one that cannot replicate in P. multocida—via electroporation. The Tn mobilized or jumped off the plasmid and into the genome at a frequency of about 4,000 events/microgram of DNA. The resulting progeny possessed the tetracycline resistance gene from Tn916 and were easily selectable by the drug. Also discussed above was the fact that a panel of independent transposon mutants defective in capsule biosynthesis from the virulent parental strain were generated. After using a combination of visual and biochemical screening of the approximately 10⁵ transfected colonies, two classes of capsule defects have been found which result in microcapsular or acapsular mutants. The first class (seven independent strains) possessed a very small capsule of HA, hence named microcapsular. The encapsulated wild-type strain produces large mucoid, iridescent colonies on media plates and the individual cells form a capsule with a thickness approximately equal to the cell body diameter as measured by light microscopy. In comparison, the microcapsular strains form smaller, iridescent colonies that appear somewhat drier on media plates; the capsule thickness of the individual cell is on the order of one quarter (or less) of the wild-type.

[0145] Four mutants (four independent strains) appeared to be truly acapsular forming small, dry colonies on media plates. No capsule was detected by light microscopy. The buoyant density of the acapsular strain, which depends on the state of encapsulation, was equivalent to wild-type cells that were stripped of their capsule by hyaluronidase treatment. These strains also lacked HA synthase activity; exogenous radiolabeled UDP-sugar precursors were added to the preparations derived from these mutants but no HA polysaccharide was formed.

[0146] Two of the acapsular mutants, TnH and TnL, possessed the interesting property that at a frequency of about 10⁻³, occasional revertants with a wild-type capsule phenotype appeared on media plates. The revertant cells possessed a wild-type capsule as deemed by light microscopy and radiometric assay for HA polysaccharide. The molecular explanation is that occasionally the Tn excised neatly from the capsule gene (no added or deleted bases) and integrates elsewhere in the chromosome. The resulting encapsulated progeny on media plates are readily observable. This reversion phenomenon is classic genetic proof that the Tn in these two strains was responsible for mutating an important site necessary for capsule synthesis. However, due to this relative instability, a Tn-derived mutant is unsuitable for an attenuated vaccine strain; at some frequencey, virulent forms could arise.

[0147] Southern blotting was used to map the location of the Tn in both the original acapsular mutants and the encapsulated revertants. TnH and TnL have a Tn element in the same locus as deemed by the pattern after HindIII or BstXI digestion as shown in FIG. 12. FIG. 12 is a Southern blot mapping of the Tn mutants. Chromosomal DNA from an assortment of capsule mutants, encapsulated revertants, and controls were digested with HindIII. The DNA was separated by gel electrophoresis and subjected to Southern blot analysis. The Tn probe recognizes two bands for each transposon due to an internal restriction site (forms a large 10 kb and a small 5 kb arm). The Tn probe does not hybridize with DNA from the parental strain without a Tn (lane 0). Multiple DNA preparations derived from separate colonies of the acapsular mutants TnH (H) and TnL (L) or individual encapsulated revertants (noted with underlined letters) were run. All the mutants had a single Tn element insertion, except for TnL which usually had 2 copies of the Tn (one of the subcultured strains had 3 copies). TnW (W) is a mucoid Tn-containing control strain. The positions of the lambda HindIII markers (λ) for 23.1, 9.4, and 6.6 kb (top to bottom) are marked.

[0148] The Tn element in the acapsular mutants H and L (which have no HA synthase activity), and a representative microcapsular mutant, TnD (D), map to the same position. Upon reversion to the mucoid phenotype, the relative Tn element moved to a new location in every case. The disrupted DNA from the mutants was isolated at this locus and probes were generated for the capsule genes.

[0149] Subsequent sequence analysis determined that the TnH and TnL insertions were approximately 1 kb apart. In all cases, the revertants of these mutants lost the Tn at the original position and gained a new Tn at different sites (i.e. FIG. 12, lanes with the underlined letters). Alternatively, there has never been an observed reversion of any of the microcapsular mutants to the encapsulated form. The Tn responsible for all of the microcapsular mutants (typified by TnD) mapped to the same 17 kilobase HindIII fragment as the TnH and TnL mutants. This co-localization was confirmed by mapping with BstXI as well.

[0150] In the other acapsular mutants, TnA and TnG, the Tn elements were located in other irrelevant genes and the HA capsule locus was rendered nonfunctional by spontaneous mutations. The occasional spontaneous mutation is to be expected; in fact, in similar studies of the streptococcal capsule locus, 12 out of 13 strains were the result of spontaneous mutations.

[0151] The Tn916 insertional mutagenesis was used to identify and clone the DNA involved in HA capsule biosynthesis of P. multocida. In accomplishing this task, three steps were used: (i) sequencing of host DNA at a Tn insertion site utilizing a primer corresponding to DNA at the terminus of Tn916, (ii) designing PCR primers for the capsule gene based on the new sequences to amplify the DNA segment between two Tn elements, and (iii) screening wild-type genomic libraries in lambda virus for a functional clone utilizing the capsule locus-specific PCR product as a hybridization probe.

[0152] The key step in obtaining the P. multocida DNA adjacent to the Tn was the use of the recently formulated direct sequencing technique which has been fully described in DeAngelis, P. L. (1998) “Transposon Tn916 insertional mutagenesis of Pasturella multocida and direct sequencing of the disruption site,” Microbial Pathogenesis, which is fully incorporated by reference herein. The P. multocida genome from all capsular types contains many sites for the restriction enzyme HhaI; thus almost every DNA fragment in the digest is less than 7 kilobases (kb) and is shown in FIG. 13, lane “O”.

[0153]FIG. 13 depicts chimeric DNA templates for sequence analysis of Tn disruption sites. Through this method, the DNA sequence of any gene interrupted by the Tn916 element can be rapidly and directly obtained. The method capitalizes on the differential sensitivity of the Tn element and the type A P. multocida genome to the restriction enzyme HhaI. The 16 kb Tn element has only one HhaI site resulting in 12 and 4 kb fragments upon digestion. Therefore, any gene interrupted by the Tn element will have an additional 12 kb of DNA. The increase in HhaI fragment size allows the facile resolution of the Tn-tagged gene from the rest of the chromosomal DNA by conventional agarose electrophoresis. This 0.7% gel shows the HhaI digest pattern of chromosomal DNAs from the parental strain without a Tn (lane 0), and several Tn-containings mutants (Tn mutant lanes). The lambda/HindIII markers (lane S) are denoted in kb. The chimeric Tn/genomic DNA fragments that migrate at approximately 13-17 kb (marked with the arrow) are only found in the Tn mutants. Note that lane L has three chimeric bands; this particular mutant has three Tn elements ( see FIG. 12).

[0154] The chimeric DNA can be isolated and used directly as a sequencing template; no cloning or PCR is required. The resulting large chimeric DNA molecule, which is readily separated from the rest of the small genomic fragments by agarose gel electrophoresis, serves as the template in cycle sequencing reactions. A sequencing primer corresponding to the right-hand terminus of the Tn916 directs elongation outward into the disrupted DNA. Thus, sequence data at the disruption site of mutant DNA can be routinely obtained without PCR amplification or cloning the template DNA.

[0155] The new sequence information was used to design PCR primers for amplification of the region of DNA between the TnL and TnH mutants. A specific 1 kb product was used as a hybridization probe to obtain a 5.8 kb portion of the capsule biosynthesis operon of Type A P. multocida, as outlined in FIG. 14 which shows the schematic of HA biosynthesis locus of Type A P. multocida. As FIG. 14 depicts, the insert of a Type A genomic DNA clone that could direct biosynthesis of HA in E. coli was sequenced. It was found that the open reading frames encode: two proteins similar to E. coli molecules implicated in polysaccharide transport, Kps and KfaA; a HA synthase that polymerizes HA polysaccharide; and a precursor forming enzyme, UDP-glucose dehydrogenase. Deletion analysis of the original plasmid showed that an intact HA synthase was essential for HA production in heterologous bacteria. The location of the original Tn insertions corresponding to TnH and TnL are marked with stars. The Tn insertion events apparently caused polar mutations that stopped expression of the downstream HA synthase and dehydrogenase genes. Thus, by using sequence analysis, the intact open reading frames of the novel PmHAS and a putative polysaccharide transport homolog, similar to E. coli KfaA, were found. The data also shows that an UDP-Glc dehydrogenase homolog, which makes UDP-GlcA precursor, and another transporter protein, an E. coli kps gene homolog, are present near the HA synthase.

[0156] The single 110 kDa protein from P. multocida, PmHAS, directs HA capsule production in E. coli. The capsule of the recombinant cells produced with the PmHAS on a plasmid was as thick as the virulent wild type strain. The capsular material was deemed authentic HA by its susceptibility to specific HA lyase digestion and its reactivity with selective HA-binding protein. Interestingly, PmHAS is not very similar to the other HASs at the amino acid level.

[0157] In order to make stable isogenic mutants of P. multocida, a modification of a mutagenesis method employed with P. haemolytica was employed. A knockout cassette for targeted inactivation by a double crossover of the HA synthase was made. A promoterless chloramphenicol resistance gene (cat) was inserted into the middle of the entire PmHAS open reading frame (at the XhoI site), and cloned into a plasmid (pKK223-3) that does not stably replicate in P. multocida. The plasmid was transformed into encapsulated wild-type strain and the cells were plated on media with chloramphenicol. When integrated into the target gene, the intact PmHAS protein is no longer formed. The cat gene is transcribed by the endogenous capsule gene promoter; the downstream gene, UDP-glucose dehydrogenase should not be affected. Therefore, true isogenic mutants are formed.

[0158] Three isogenic acapsular mutants have been isolated. None of these mutants were detected as having capsules under light microscopy and India ink staining. The HA synthase was disrupted at both the DNA and biochemical levels. See e.g. Table II. By Western blot analysis using an antibody directed against a portion of the PmHAS enzyme, the acapsular knockout mutant was missing the approximately 110 KDa band, the PmHAS enzyme, found in the wild-type parent. In combination with the data in Table II (the lack of polysaccharide production), no functional PmHAS is found in the knockout strain.

[0159] Certain regions are common or very similar between genes of the various capsular types. This is shown in the Southern blot analysis of Type D or F DNA depicted in FIG. 15. As depicted in FIG. 15, chromosomal DNA from Type A, F, or D strains was digested with either HindIII or EcoRI (right or left lane, respectively, for each probe) and subjected to Southern blotting. Digoxigenin-labeled PCR product probes corresponding to regions of either the kfaA homolog (K) or HA synthase (H) genes from Type A were used to detect homologous sequences in bacteria of other capsule types (bands marked with stars). KfaA homologs are apparent in both Type F and D. A very similar synthase homolog is found in Type F, but not in Type D. The probes are suitable for screening libraries. The lambda/HindIII standards are marked in kilobases.

[0160] Type F has regions that are similar to both probes, while Type D was only similar to the transporter protein probe. PCR was used with several sets of primers corresponding to the Type A sequences to amplify Type D or F genomic DNA as shown in FIG. 16. PCR of heterologous DNA with Type A primers is depicted in FIG. 16. Various primer pairs corresponding to the kfaA homolog gene (Panel A) or the HA synthase gene (Panel B) of the Type A strain were used to amplify genomic DNA isolated from several other P. multocida strains with different capsule types. Forty cycles (94° C., 30 sec; 42° C., 30 sec; 72° C., 60 sec) of polymerase chain reaction with Taq enzyme were performed.

[0161] The reaction mixes were separated on a 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium (lanes: A, Type A; D, Type D; F, Type F; 0, no template control. Standards (S) are the 100 bp ladder, the 1 and 0.5 kb bands are marked with arrows. The P-I primer pair shows products for all three capsule types, but the Type D product is smaller than the other products. The P-II and P-III pairs amplify Type A and F DNA only. In contrast, the P-IV and P-V pairs amplify Type A only. It appears that the Type A and F capsule loci are more similar to each other than to type D. The PCR products from the P-I primer pair will serve as good hybridization probes for the capsule locus from other types.

[0162] Not all combinations of primers yielded PCR products with the heterologous template DNA. 0.2-1 kb portions of Type F genes encoding the HA synthase or the capsule polysaccharide transporter analog were amplified. Also amplified was a 1 kb region of the Type D genome encoding the transporter protein. Sequence analysis of several PCR products revealed homologous yet distinct sequences. Overall, this data suggests that the Type A and F strains are more related to each other and not as similar to type D. Sequence comparison of Type A and F KfaA homologs and E. coli KfaA is shown in FIG. 17. The PCR product that was generated by amplification of Type F DNA with the P-I primer set (see FIG. 16) was gel-purified and sequenced with one of the original primers. It was found that the type A and F sequences were very similar at the amino acid level; this partial alignment of the protein sequences shows that in this region the sequences are largely identical with some mismatches (the differences are underlined in FIG. 17). Overall, the P. multocida sequences are quite homologous to the E. coli KfaA protein, which is implicated in polysaccharide transport (the identical residues are bolded in FIG. 17). These PCR products will also be useful as hybridization probes to obtain functional capsule loci from Type D or F genomic libraries. The cloned DNA also allows the construction of gene knockout plasmids: wherein, the resulting mutant strains are useful for virulence assays or vaccines.

[0163] The production of the bacterial capsule of P. multocida involves at least the following steps: (i) synthesis of sugar nucleotide precursors; (ii) polymerization of precursors to form the capsular polysaccharide; and (iii) export or transport of the polysaccharide to the extracellular space where capsule assembly occurs. Of course, there are potential regulatory genes or factors that control enzyme levels or enzymatic activity, but the focus is on the major structural enzymes of the pathway. In E. coli, the candidate type 2 capsule genes encoding enzymes for this process are located together at a single site on the bacterial chromosome. E. coli strains that make capsules with different structures have varied enzymes for step (i) and (ii) above, but all appear to share a common transport/export machinery for step (iii).

[0164] It has been discovered that in S. pyogenes, a single integral membrane enzyme polymerizes the precursor sugars, and also transports the HA polysaccharide across the membrane. Type A P. multocida has four different genes that are involved in each of the three biosynthetic steps for bacterial capsule production. (See FIG. 14) The similarity of the P. multocida polysaccharide transporter to the E. coli homolog at the protein level suggests that the general functions of some other capsule genes may also be similar to these two species.

[0165] The role of the capsule as a virulence factor in fowl cholera has been assessed. In order to avoid pitfalls and caveats encountered in studies of bacterial capsules and virulence, defined mutants were compared to the wild-type microbes. Isogenic Type A mutants having disrupted capsule genes were tested for their ability to avoid preexisting or preimmune host defenses in vitro, as well as to infect living fowl in vivo. The stable isogenic mutants were produced according to the methods described hereinabove. Using a disrupted version of the PmHAS gene on a plasmid (see FIG. 18) and homologous recombination, a recombinant P. multocida strain was created that had lost the ability to make a hyaluronan capsule. The strain was further analyzed at both the DNA and biochemical levels. We found that the functional HA synthase gene was replaced with a defective gene containing a cat cassette disruption by both Southern blot and PCR analyses. (See FIG. 19).

[0166] Confirmation of gene disruption is shown in FIG. 19. Panel A is a Southern blot analysis. Chromosomal DNA from various strains was digested with HindIII, separated on a 0.7% agarose gel, and transferred to nitrocellulose. The blot was hybridized with a P. multocida HAS gene probe. Two bands were detected due to an internal HindIII restriction site in PmHAS gene. Lane M is the mucoid transformant; Lane KO is the acapsular knockout mutant; Lane P is the parental strain. The addition of the 670 bp cat cassette causes the size shift of the upper band in the KO lane (marked with an arrow).

[0167] Panel B of FIG. 19 is a PCR analysis. The DNA in cell lysates from various strains was amplified by 35 cycles of PCR with a pair of oligonucleotide primers that flank the XhoI site of PmHAS. The length of the amplicon from the normal, wild-type gene is 650 base pairs. The PCR reactions were separated on a 1% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. Lane M is the mucoid transformant; Lane KO is the acapsular knockout mutant; Lane P is the parental strain; Lane C is the cloned PmHAS plasmid control; and Lane S are the size standards. The PCR product produced by the knockout mutant template is approximately 1,300 bp (marked with arrow); this band is composed of the 670 bp cat cassette and the 650 bp derived from PmHAS. No wild-type amplicon is detected in the knockout strain reaction, therefore, homologous recombination mediated by a double crossover event occurred.

[0168] Furthermore, utilizing a sensitive radiochemical assay for HA polysaccharide, it was found that the mutant strain did not produce HA, and is shown in Table II which lists the HA production of various strains. TABLE II HA polysaccharide (nanograms/ml Strain per OD₆₀₀) P = wild type parent 1,200 M = Mucoid transformant 1,200 KO = Acapsular knockout mutant ≦0.05

[0169] The strains listed in Table II were overnight cultures of the various strains which were tested for the presence of HA polysaccharide using the specific radiometric assay outlined hereinabove. The cultures were normalized by spectrophotometry and the data was presented as the concentration of HA in a culture with an absorbance of 1.0 at 600 nm. The wild-type parent or a mucoid, encapsulated transformant synthesized substantial amounts of HA. In contrast, no detectable HA was produced by the acapsular knockout mutant (KO). Thus, the role of the capsule in virulence could be assessed. The methodology employed could also be used to construct other mutants of P. multocida and one of ordinary skill in the art, given the disclosure of the present invention, could accomplish such a task.

[0170] Animal testing has compared the in vivo pathogenicity of the mutants to complemented mutant controls and wild-type Type A P. multocida. The knockout strain of Type A Pasturella multocida ATCC 15742, (which causes fowl cholera), was shipped to the USDA Research Station in Ames, Iowa for virulence testing. Using targeted homologous recombination, capsule biosynthesis of the knockout strain has been disrupted and the knockout strain was predicted to be 1,000-fold less virulent.

[0171] The virulence testing was carried out to check the safety of the KO strain as a vaccine strain. Turkey eggs were hatched in clean conditions and raised to the age of two weeks. The poults were injected with various concentrations of bacteria (either wild-type parent or the knockout strain). The bacterial count was enumerated by spectroscopy and colony counting after plating. The animals were injected intramuscularly and placed in a biological containment pen. The inoculated poults (groups of 6 or 7 per microbial dose ranging from about 80 to 10⁷ bacteria in 10 fold steps)were observed. The general appearance, level of activity and morbidity was checked for 6 days. Dead or dying birds were autopsied and checked for the presence of lesions, abscesses, and organ failure.

[0172] The results of the in vivo experiments are summarized in Table III. TABLE III No. of cells per Strain injection Mortality rate Wild-type wild type 8 × 10³ 43% Wild-type wild type 860 17% Mutant w/HAS 1 × 10⁷  0% knockout

[0173] The point of this type of testing was to assess the general trends of infection with respect to encapsulation of the pathogen. For each determination, white turkeys were inoculated with a titered amount of bacteria IM. Symptoms and death of the turkeys was measured and tabulated in order to compare the relative virulence of the mutants. Protection trials will be conducted in order to determine if immunized turkeys can survive a challenge with wild-type virulent organisms.

[0174] Type A knockout strains that infect cattle and rabbits have also been prepared. Testing will be conducted in vivo in order to determine both the pathogenicity of these knockout strains as well as protection trials to determine if the immunized animals can survive a challenge with wild-type virulent organisms.

[0175] Two main types of protection experiments will be performed. First, passive immunization is done. One chicken is infected with the potential vaccine KO strain and a sample of its serum (with protective antibodies) is taken about 1-2 weeks after inoculation. This sera or derived purified antibody is injected into a naive chicken. The naive chicken is challenged with wild-type strain. The bird, if it receives protective antibody, will survive the challenge with the otherwise lethal wild-type bacteria.

[0176] Second, active immunization will be undertaken. In this case, the same chicken is sequentially infected with the potential vaccine KO strain, and a few weeks later, the bird is challenged with a normally lethal dose of wild-type bacteria. In this case antibody-mediated and cell mediated immunity are tested.

[0177] Using the present invention, it is predicted that there are similarities in the caps arides. The present invention also relates to a homologous Type F P. multocida gene (“PmCS”). The PmCS sequence information is provided in SEQ. ID No. 3 The Type F gene is approximately 85% identical to the Type A gene and the sequence comparison is shown in FIG. 20. This homology was found at the DNA level between the cloned type A capsule genes and certain regions of the Type D and F genomes by Southern blotting and PCR, as shown in FIGS. 15, 16, and 17. Libraries of Type F genomic DNA in lambda phage were screened to isolate the homologous capsule loci. Libraries of Type D genomic DNA in lambda phage will be screened to isolate the homologous capsule loci and one of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate and understand that the Type D capsule loci can be determined in exactly the same manner as with the Type A and F. The type A and F PmHAS sequences are 89% similar.

[0178] The Type F polysaccharide synthase gene was obtained by using a PCR product hybridization probe, FIG. 16, joining the HAS homolog and the Kfa homolog. A 3 kb amplicon was produced using genomic DNA from a Type F strain and the appropriate primers from a Kfa and synthase regions. This material was labeled with digoxigenin and used to obtain a clone and subsequently a plasmid from a Type F genomic DNA library in Lambda ZAP Express library (as described for the Type A cloning. The positively hybridizing clone was sequenced. As in the case of the Type A HA synthase gene, PmHAS, the functionality was checked by expression in the pKK223-3 (Pharmacia) vector in E. coli. It was found that this enzyme incorporated in vitro UDP-GalNAc and UDP-GlcA into high molecular weight polymer as expected for a chondroitin molecule.

[0179] The capsular polysaccharide synthases were monitored with antibodies and Western blot analysis. The antibodies were generated against a synthetic peptide that corresponds to a shared, homologous region (12-20 amino acid residues) of the synthase enzymes. Western blots confirmed that both Type A and Type F P. multocida had an immunoreactive 110 kDa protein by SDS-PAGE.

[0180]FIG. 21 is a Western blot analysis of native and recombinant PmHAS proteins. The native PmHAS and various recombinant truncated PmHAS-derived proteins made in E. coli were compared on SDS-PAGE gels. For the recombinant samples, the total lysate (T), the membranes (M), and the cytoplasm (C) were subjected to Western blotting with an anti-PmHAS antibody. The original protein found in native Pasturella multocida (Pm, lane W; marked with an arrow) migrates at about 110 kDa; the knockout vaccine strain (KO lane) is missing this band. The native PmHAS and a recombinant version missing a portion of the carboxyl terminus (PmΔCC) had HA synthase activity. The other truncated constructs were inactive.

[0181] 4. Use of the PmHAS in Diagnostic Applications

[0182] The present invention also relates to the generation of useful probes that facilitate the identification of Type A, D, and F P. multocida or P. haemolytica in the field. The diagnosis of which particular strain is present in animals is currently determined by serology, agglutination, or DNA fingerprinting after restriction analysis. The former two methods can be problematic, frequently yield false identification, and vary depending on the source of typing antiserum. Capsular serology of the Carter Types A, D, and F does not even employ an antibody because these polymers are such poor immunogens. Instead, laborious assays involving enzymatic digestion or cell flocculation with acriflavine are routinely employed. DNA fingerprinting is accurate, but it relies on extensive knowledge of numerous type strains on file. Sets of capsule-specific primers will be used to readily perform these epidemiological studies, specifically by using rapid, facile PCR analysis to identify pathogenic isolates in half a day with minimal handling and no subculturing. Once the pathogen is identified, a more informed decision could be made on the choice of antibiotic or vaccine.

[0183] The utility of the use of capsule DNA information to quickly ascertain the type of P. multocida is obvious in light of the problems with current typing methods. Either hybridization or PCR-based typing is envisioned as practical, sensitive, and rapid. One specific embodiment would be to bring an appropriately labeled or tagged synthase DNA probe (or by extension a capsule locus gene which differs among capsule type) that by virtue of its uniqueness can be distinguished under appropriate hybridization conditions (e.g. complementary gene and probes hybridize to yield a signal while nonidentical gene from another capsular type does not hybridize thus no signal is obtained). Another specific embodiment would be to design PCR primers that can distinguish the capsule types. An amplicon of the correct size would signify a particular capsule type; no amplicon signifies another distinct capsule type.

[0184] In the current state of the art, several PCR primer pairs which give distinguishable and different size bands in a single reaction can be envisioned. Such a multiplex method would allow many reactions to be performed simultaneously. The knowledge of the DNA sequence of the various capsule biosynthesis loci, in particular the syntheses, allows these tests to rapidly distinguish the various pathogenic strains.

[0185] Thus, it should be apparent that there has been provided in accordance with the present invention an isolated and sequenced PmHAS and a methods for making and using the PmHAS and knockout strains of P. multocida that fully satisfy the objectives and advantages set forth above. Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.

1 9 1 703 PRT Pasteurella multocida 1 Met Asn Thr Leu Ser Gln Ala Ile Lys Ala Tyr Asn Ser Asn Asp Tyr 1 5 10 15 Gln Leu Ala Leu Lys Leu Phe Glu Lys Ser Ala Glu Ile Tyr Gly Arg 20 25 30 Lys Ile Val Glu Phe Gln Ile Thr Lys Cys Lys Glu Lys Leu Ser Ala 35 40 45 His Pro Ser Val Asn Ser Ala His Leu Ser Val Asn Lys Glu Glu Lys 50 55 60 Val Asn Val Cys Asp Ser Pro Leu Asp Ile Ala Thr Gln Leu Leu Leu 65 70 75 80 Ser Asn Val Lys Lys Leu Val Leu Ser Asp Ser Glu Lys Asn Thr Leu 85 90 95 Lys Asn Lys Trp Lys Leu Leu Thr Glu Lys Lys Ser Glu Asn Ala Glu 100 105 110 Val Arg Ala Val Ala Leu Val Pro Lys Asp Phe Pro Lys Asp Leu Val 115 120 125 Leu Ala Pro Leu Pro Asp His Val Asn Asp Phe Thr Trp Tyr Lys Lys 130 135 140 Arg Lys Lys Arg Leu Gly Ile Lys Pro Glu His Gln His Val Gly Leu 145 150 155 160 Ser Ile Ile Val Thr Thr Phe Asn Arg Pro Ala Ile Leu Ser Ile Thr 165 170 175 Leu Ala Cys Leu Val Asn Gln Lys Thr His Tyr Pro Phe Glu Val Ile 180 185 190 Val Thr Asp Asp Gly Ser Gln Glu Asp Leu Ser Pro Ile Ile Arg Gln 195 200 205 Tyr Glu Asn Lys Leu Asp Ile Arg Tyr Val Arg Gln Lys Asp Asn Gly 210 215 220 Phe Gln Ala Ser Ala Ala Arg Asn Met Gly Leu Arg Leu Ala Lys Tyr 225 230 235 240 Asp Phe Ile Gly Leu Leu Asp Cys Asp Met Ala Pro Asn Pro Leu Trp 245 250 255 Val His Ser Tyr Val Ala Glu Leu Leu Glu Asp Asp Asp Leu Thr Ile 260 265 270 Ile Gly Pro Arg Lys Tyr Ile Asp Thr Gln His Ile Asp Pro Lys Asp 275 280 285 Phe Leu Asn Asn Ala Ser Leu Leu Glu Ser Leu Pro Glu Val Lys Thr 290 295 300 Asn Asn Ser Val Ala Ala Lys Gly Glu Gly Thr Val Ser Leu Asp Trp 305 310 315 320 Arg Leu Glu Gln Phe Glu Lys Thr Glu Asn Leu Arg Leu Ser Asp Ser 325 330 335 Pro Phe Arg Phe Phe Ala Ala Gly Asn Val Ala Phe Ala Lys Lys Trp 340 345 350 Leu Asn Lys Ser Gly Phe Phe Asp Glu Glu Phe Asn His Trp Gly Gly 355 360 365 Glu Asp Val Glu Phe Gly Tyr Arg Leu Phe Arg Tyr Gly Ser Phe Phe 370 375 380 Lys Thr Ile Asp Gly Ile Met Ala Tyr His Gln Glu Pro Pro Gly Lys 385 390 395 400 Glu Asn Glu Thr Asp Arg Glu Ala Gly Lys Asn Ile Thr Leu Asp Ile 405 410 415 Met Arg Glu Lys Val Pro Tyr Ile Tyr Arg Lys Leu Leu Pro Ile Glu 420 425 430 Asp Ser His Ile Asn Arg Val Pro Leu Val Ser Ile Tyr Ile Pro Ala 435 440 445 Tyr Asn Cys Ala Asn Tyr Ile Gln Arg Cys Val Asp Ser Ala Leu Asn 450 455 460 Gln Thr Val Val Asp Leu Glu Val Cys Ile Cys Asn Asp Gly Ser Thr 465 470 475 480 Asp Asn Thr Leu Glu Val Ile Asn Lys Leu Tyr Gly Asn Asn Pro Arg 485 490 495 Val Arg Ile Met Ser Lys Pro Asn Gly Gly Ile Ala Ser Ala Ser Asn 500 505 510 Ala Ala Val Ser Phe Ala Lys Gly Tyr Tyr Ile Gly Gln Leu Asp Ser 515 520 525 Asp Asp Tyr Leu Glu Pro Asp Ala Val Glu Leu Cys Leu Lys Glu Phe 530 535 540 Leu Lys Asp Lys Thr Leu Ala Cys Val Tyr Thr Thr Asn Arg Asn Val 545 550 555 560 Asn Pro Asp Gly Ser Leu Ile Ala Asn Gly Tyr Asn Trp Pro Glu Phe 565 570 575 Ser Arg Glu Lys Leu Thr Thr Ala Met Ile Ala His His Phe Arg Met 580 585 590 Phe Thr Ile Arg Ala Trp His Leu Thr Asp Gly Phe Asn Glu Lys Ile 595 600 605 Glu Asn Ala Val Asp Tyr Asp Met Phe Leu Lys Leu Ser Glu Val Gly 610 615 620 Lys Phe Lys His Leu Asn Lys Ile Cys Tyr Asn Arg Val Leu His Gly 625 630 635 640 Asp Asn Thr Ser Ile Lys Lys Leu Gly Ile Gln Lys Lys Asn His Phe 645 650 655 Val Val Val Asn Gln Ser Leu Asn Arg Gln Gly Ile Thr Tyr Tyr Asn 660 665 670 Tyr Asp Glu Phe Asp Asp Leu Asp Glu Ser Arg Lys Tyr Ile Phe Asn 675 680 685 Lys Thr Ala Glu Tyr Gln Glu Glu Ile Asp Ile Leu Lys Asp Ile 690 695 700 2 2920 DNA Pasteurella multocida 2 atgaatacat tatcacaagc aataaaagca tataacagca atgactatca attagcactc 60 aaattatttg aaaagtcggc ggaaatctat ggacggaaaa ttgttgaatt tcaaattacc 120 aaatgcaaag aaaaactctc agcacatcct tctgttaatt cagcacatct ttctgtaaat 180 aaagaagaaa aagtcaatgt ttgcgatagt ccgttagata ttgcaacaca actgttactt 240 tccaacgtaa aaaaattagt actttctgac tcggaaaaaa acacgttaaa aaataaatgg 300 aaattgctca ctgagaagaa atctgaaaat gcggaggtaa gagcggtcgc ccttgtacca 360 aaagattttc ccaaagatct ggttttagcg cctttacctg atcatgttaa tgattttaca 420 tggtacaaaa agcgaaagaa aagacttggc ataaaacctg aacatcaaca tgttggtctt 480 tctattatcg ttacaacatt caatcgacca gcaattttat cgattacatt agcctgttta 540 gtaaaccaaa aaacacatta cccgtttgaa gttatcgtga cagatgatgg tagtcaggaa 600 gatctatcac cgatcattcg ccaatatgaa aataaattgg atattcgcta cgtcagacaa 660 aaagataacg gttttcaagc cagtgccgct cggaatatgg gattacgctt agcaaaatat 720 gactttattg gcttactcga ctgtgatatg gcgccaaatc cattatgggt tcattcttat 780 gttgcagagc tattagaaga tgatgattta acaatcattg gtccaagaaa atacatcgat 840 acacaacata ttgacccaaa agacttctta aataacgcga gtttgcttga atcattacca 900 gaagtgaaaa ccaataatag tgttgccgca aaaggggaag gaacagtttc tctggattgg 960 cgcttagaac aattcgaaaa aacagaaaat ctccgcttat ccgattcgcc tttccgtttt 1020 tttgcggcgg gtaatgttgc tttcgctaaa aaatggctaa ataaatccgg tttctttgat 1080 gaggaattta atcactgggg tggagaagat gtggaatttg gatatcgctt attccgttac 1140 ggtagtttct ttaaaactat tgatggcatt atggcctacc atcaagagcc accaggtaaa 1200 gaaaatgaaa ccgatcgtga agcgggaaaa aatattacgc tcgatattat gagagaaaag 1260 gtcccttata tctatagaaa acttttacca atagaagatt cgcatatcaa tagagtacct 1320 ttagtttcaa tttatatccc agcttataac tgtgcaaact atattcaacg ttgcgtagat 1380 agtgcactga atcagactgt tgttgatctc gaggtttgta tttgtaacga tggttcaaca 1440 gataatacct tagaagtgat caataagctt tatggtaata atcctagggt acgcatcatg 1500 tctaaaccaa atggcggaat agcctcagca tcaaatgcag ccgtttcttt tgctaaaggt 1560 tattacattg ggcagttaga ttcagatgat tatcttgagc ctgatgcagt tgaactgtgt 1620 ttaaaagaat ttttaaaaga taaaacgcta gcttgtgttt ataccactaa tagaaacgtc 1680 aatccggatg gtagcttaat cgctaatggt tacaattggc cagaattttc acgagaaaaa 1740 ctcacaacgg ctatgattgc tcaccacttt agaatgttca cgattagagc ttggcattta 1800 actgatggat tcaatgaaaa aattgaaaat gccgtagact atgacatgtt cctcaaactc 1860 agtgaagttg gaaaatttaa acatcttaat aaaatctgct ataaccgtgt attacatggt 1920 gataacacat caattaagaa acttggcatt caaaagaaaa accattttgt tgtagtcaat 1980 cagtcattaa atagacaagg cataacttat tataattatg acgaatttga tgatttagat 2040 gaaagtagaa agtatatttt caataaaacc gctgaatatc aagaagagat tgatatctta 2100 aaagatatta aaatcatcca gaataaagat gccaaaatcg cagtcagtat tttttatccc 2160 aatacattaa acggcttagt gaaaaaacta aacaatatta ttgaatataa taaaaatata 2220 ttcgttattg ttctacatgt tgataagaat catcttacac cagatatcaa aaaagaaata 2280 ctagccttct atcataaaca tcaagtgaat attttactaa ataatgatat ctcatattac 2340 acgagtaata gattaataaa aactgaggcg catttaagta atattaataa attaagtcag 2400 ttaaatctaa attgtgaata catcattttt gataatcatg acagcctatt cgttaaaaat 2460 gacagctatg cttatatgaa aaaatatgat gtcggcatga atttctcagc attaacacat 2520 gattggatcg agaaaatcaa tgcgcatcca ccatttaaaa agctcattaa aacttatttt 2580 aatgacaatg acttaaaaag tatgaatgtg aaaggggcat cacaaggtat gtttatgacg 2640 tatgcgctag cgcatgagct tctgacgatt attaaagaag tcatcacatc ttgccagtca 2700 attgatagtg tgccagaata taacactgag gatatttggt tccaatttgc acttttaatc 2760 ttagaaaaga aaaccggcca tgtatttaat aaaacatcga ccctgactta tatgccttgg 2820 gaacgaaaat tacaatggac aaatgaacaa attgaaagtg caaaaagagg agaaaatata 2880 cctgttaaca agttcattat taatagtata actctataaa 2920 3 965 PRT Pasteurella multocida 3 Met Asn Thr Leu Ser Gln Ala Ile Lys Ala Tyr Asn Ser Asn Asp Tyr 1 5 10 15 Glu Leu Ala Leu Lys Leu Phe Glu Lys Ser Ala Glu Thr Tyr Gly Arg 20 25 30 Lys Ile Val Glu Phe Gln Ile Ile Lys Cys Lys Glu Lys Leu Ser Thr 35 40 45 Asn Ser Tyr Val Ser Glu Asp Lys Lys Asn Ser Val Cys Asp Ser Ser 50 55 60 Leu Asp Ile Ala Thr Gln Leu Leu Leu Ser Asn Val Lys Lys Leu Thr 65 70 75 80 Leu Ser Glu Ser Glu Lys Asn Ser Leu Lys Asn Lys Trp Lys Ser Ile 85 90 95 Thr Gly Lys Lys Ser Glu Asn Ala Glu Ile Arg Lys Val Glu Leu Val 100 105 110 Pro Lys Asp Phe Pro Lys Asp Leu Val Leu Ala Pro Leu Pro Asp His 115 120 125 Val Asn Asp Phe Thr Trp Tyr Lys Asn Arg Lys Lys Ser Leu Gly Ile 130 135 140 Lys Pro Val Asn Lys Asn Ile Gly Leu Ser Ile Ile Ile Pro Thr Phe 145 150 155 160 Asn Arg Ser Arg Ile Leu Asp Ile Thr Leu Ala Cys Leu Val Asn Gln 165 170 175 Lys Thr Asn Tyr Pro Phe Glu Val Val Val Ala Asp Asp Gly Ser Lys 180 185 190 Glu Asn Leu Leu Thr Ile Val Gln Lys Tyr Glu Gln Lys Leu Asp Ile 195 200 205 Lys Tyr Val Arg Gln Lys Asp Tyr Gly Tyr Gln Leu Cys Ala Val Arg 210 215 220 Asn Leu Gly Leu Arg Thr Ala Lys Tyr Asp Phe Val Ser Ile Leu Asp 225 230 235 240 Cys Asp Met Ala Pro Gln Gln Leu Trp Val His Ser Tyr Leu Thr Glu 245 250 255 Leu Leu Glu Asp Asn Asp Ile Val Leu Ile Gly Pro Arg Lys Tyr Val 260 265 270 Asp Thr His Asn Ile Thr Ala Glu Gln Phe Leu Asn Asp Pro Tyr Leu 275 280 285 Ile Glu Ser Leu Pro Glu Thr Ala Thr Asn Asn Asn Pro Ser Ile Thr 290 295 300 Ser Lys Gly Asn Ile Ser Leu Asp Trp Arg Leu Glu His Phe Lys Lys 305 310 315 320 Thr Asp Asn Leu Arg Leu Cys Asp Ser Pro Phe Arg Tyr Phe Ser Cys 325 330 335 Gly Asn Val Ala Phe Ser Lys Glu Trp Leu Asn Lys Val Gly Trp Phe 340 345 350 Asp Glu Glu Phe Asn His Trp Gly Gly Glu Asp Val Glu Phe Gly Tyr 355 360 365 Arg Leu Phe Ala Lys Gly Cys Phe Phe Arg Val Ile Asp Gly Gly Met 370 375 380 Ala Tyr His Gln Glu Pro Pro Gly Lys Glu Asn Glu Thr Asp Arg Glu 385 390 395 400 Ala Gly Lys Ser Ile Thr Leu Lys Ile Val Lys Glu Lys Val Pro Tyr 405 410 415 Ile Tyr Arg Lys Leu Leu Pro Ile Glu Asp Ser His Ile His Arg Ile 420 425 430 Pro Leu Val Ser Ile Tyr Ile Pro Ala Tyr Asn Cys Ala Asn Tyr Ile 435 440 445 Gln Arg Cys Val Asp Ser Ala Leu Asn Gln Thr Val Val Asp Leu Glu 450 455 460 Val Cys Ile Cys Asn Asp Gly Ser Thr Asp Asn Thr Leu Glu Val Ile 465 470 475 480 Asn Lys Leu Tyr Gly Asn Asn Pro Arg Val Arg Ile Met Ser Lys Pro 485 490 495 Asn Gly Gly Ile Ala Ser Ala Ser Asn Ala Ala Val Ser Phe Ala Lys 500 505 510 Gly Tyr Tyr Ile Gly Gln Leu Asp Ser Asp Asp Tyr Leu Glu Pro Asp 515 520 525 Ala Val Glu Leu Cys Leu Lys Glu Phe Leu Lys Asp Lys Thr Leu Ala 530 535 540 Cys Val Tyr Thr Thr Asn Arg Asn Val Asn Pro Asp Gly Ser Leu Ile 545 550 555 560 Ala Asn Gly Tyr Asn Trp Pro Glu Phe Ser Arg Glu Lys Leu Thr Thr 565 570 575 Ala Met Ile Ala His His Phe Arg Met Phe Thr Ile Arg Ala Trp His 580 585 590 Leu Thr Asp Gly Phe Asn Glu Asn Ile Glu Asn Ala Val Asp Tyr Asp 595 600 605 Met Phe Leu Lys Leu Ser Glu Val Gly Lys Phe Lys His Leu Asn Lys 610 615 620 Ile Cys Tyr Asn Arg Val Leu His Gly Asp Asn Thr Ser Ile Lys Lys 625 630 635 640 Leu Gly Ile Gln Lys Lys Asn His Phe Val Val Val Asn Gln Ser Leu 645 650 655 Asn Arg Gln Gly Ile Asn Tyr Tyr Asn Tyr Asp Lys Phe Asp Asp Leu 660 665 670 Asp Glu Ser Arg Lys Tyr Ile Phe Asn Lys Thr Ala Glu Tyr Gln Glu 675 680 685 Glu Met Asp Ile Leu Lys Asp Leu Lys Leu Ile Gln Asn Lys Asp Ala 690 695 700 Lys Ile Ala Val Ser Ile Phe Tyr Pro Asn Thr Leu Asn Gly Leu Val 705 710 715 720 Lys Lys Leu Asn Asn Ile Ile Glu Tyr Asn Lys Asn Ile Phe Val Ile 725 730 735 Ile Leu His Val Asp Lys Asn His Leu Thr Pro Asp Ile Lys Lys Glu 740 745 750 Ile Leu Ala Phe Tyr His Lys His Gln Val Asn Ile Leu Leu Asn Asn 755 760 765 Asp Ile Ser Tyr Tyr Thr Ser Asn Arg Leu Ile Lys Thr Glu Ala His 770 775 780 Leu Ser Asn Ile Asn Lys Leu Ser Gln Leu Asn Leu Asn Cys Glu Tyr 785 790 795 800 Ile Ile Phe Asp Asn His Asp Ser Leu Phe Val Lys Asn Asp Ser Tyr 805 810 815 Ala Tyr Met Lys Lys Tyr Asp Val Gly Met Asn Phe Ser Ala Leu Thr 820 825 830 His Asp Trp Ile Glu Lys Ile Asn Ala His Pro Pro Phe Lys Lys Leu 835 840 845 Ile Lys Thr Tyr Phe Asn Asp Asn Asp Leu Arg Ser Met Asn Val Lys 850 855 860 Gly Ala Ser Gln Gly Met Phe Met Lys Tyr Ala Leu Pro His Glu Leu 865 870 875 880 Leu Thr Ile Ile Lys Glu Val Ile Thr Ser Cys Gln Ser Ile Asp Ser 885 890 895 Val Pro Glu Tyr Asn Thr Glu Asp Ile Trp Phe Gln Phe Ala Leu Leu 900 905 910 Ile Leu Glu Lys Lys Thr Gly His Val Phe Asn Lys Thr Ser Thr Leu 915 920 925 Thr Tyr Met Pro Trp Glu Arg Lys Leu Gln Trp Thr Asn Glu Gln Ile 930 935 940 Gln Ser Ala Lys Lys Gly Glu Asn Ile Pro Val Asn Lys Phe Ile Ile 945 950 955 960 Asn Ser Ile Thr Leu 965 4 45 PRT Pasteurella multocida (Type F) 4 Tyr Ile Asp Asn Gln Val Leu Lys Ala Lys Pro Arg Leu Tyr Gly Ala 1 5 10 15 Arg Asp Arg Ile Lys Asn Gln Leu Thr Tyr Arg Leu Gly Tyr Lys Ile 20 25 30 Gln Arg His Glu Lys Ser Ile Trp Ser His Phe Ser Ser 35 40 45 5 45 PRT Pasteurella multocida (Type A) 5 Tyr Ile Asp Asn Gln Val Leu Lys Ala Lys Pro Arg Leu Tyr Gly Ala 1 5 10 15 Ala Asp Arg Ile Lys Asn Gln Leu Thr Tyr Arg Leu Gly Tyr Lys Ile 20 25 30 Gln Arg His Gly Arg Ser Leu Phe Gly Leu Ile Phe Leu 35 40 45 6 47 PRT Escherichia coli 6 Phe Ile Glu Asn Gln Glu Ile Lys Lys Lys Leu Pro Pro Val Leu Tyr 1 5 10 15 Gly Ala Ala Glu Gln Ile Lys Gln Glu Leu Gly Tyr Arg Leu Gly Tyr 20 25 30 Ile Ile Val Ser Tyr Ser Lys Ser Leu Lys Gly Ile Ile Thr Met 35 40 45 7 703 PRT Pasteurella multocida 7 Met Asn Thr Leu Ser Gln Ala Ile Lys Ala Tyr Asn Ser Asn Asp Tyr 1 5 10 15 Gln Leu Ala Leu Lys Leu Phe Glu Lys Ser Ala Glu Ile Tyr Gly Arg 20 25 30 Lys Ile Val Glu Phe Gln Ile Thr Lys Cys Lys Glu Lys Leu Ser Ala 35 40 45 His Pro Ser Val Asn Ser Ala His Leu Ser Val Asn Lys Glu Glu Lys 50 55 60 Val Asn Val Cys Asp Ser Pro Leu Asp Ile Ala Thr Gln Leu Leu Leu 65 70 75 80 Ser Asn Val Lys Lys Leu Val Leu Ser Asp Ser Glu Lys Asn Thr Leu 85 90 95 Lys Asn Lys Trp Lys Leu Leu Thr Glu Lys Lys Ser Glu Asn Ala Glu 100 105 110 Val Arg Ala Val Ala Leu Val Pro Lys Asp Phe Pro Lys Asp Leu Val 115 120 125 Leu Ala Pro Leu Pro Asp His Val Asn Asp Phe Thr Trp Tyr Lys Lys 130 135 140 Arg Lys Lys Arg Leu Gly Ile Lys Pro Glu His Gln His Val Gly Leu 145 150 155 160 Ser Ile Ile Val Thr Thr Phe Asn Arg Pro Ala Ile Leu Ser Ile Thr 165 170 175 Leu Ala Cys Leu Val Asn Gln Lys Thr His Tyr Pro Phe Glu Val Ile 180 185 190 Val Thr Asp Asp Gly Ser Gln Glu Asp Leu Ser Pro Ile Ile Arg Gln 195 200 205 Tyr Glu Asn Lys Leu Asp Ile Arg Tyr Val Arg Gln Lys Asp Asn Gly 210 215 220 Phe Gln Ala Ser Ala Ala Arg Asn Met Gly Leu Arg Leu Ala Lys Tyr 225 230 235 240 Asp Phe Ile Gly Leu Leu Asp Cys Asp Met Ala Pro Asn Pro Leu Trp 245 250 255 Val His Ser Tyr Val Ala Glu Leu Leu Glu Asp Asp Asp Leu Thr Ile 260 265 270 Ile Gly Pro Arg Lys Tyr Ile Asp Thr Gln His Ile Asp Pro Lys Asp 275 280 285 Phe Leu Asn Asn Ala Ser Leu Leu Glu Ser Leu Pro Glu Val Lys Thr 290 295 300 Asn Asn Ser Val Ala Ala Lys Gly Glu Gly Thr Val Ser Leu Asp Trp 305 310 315 320 Arg Leu Glu Gln Phe Glu Lys Thr Glu Asn Leu Arg Leu Ser Asp Ser 325 330 335 Pro Phe Arg Phe Phe Ala Ala Gly Asn Val Ala Phe Ala Lys Lys Trp 340 345 350 Leu Asn Lys Ser Gly Phe Phe Asp Glu Glu Phe Asn His Trp Gly Gly 355 360 365 Glu Asp Val Glu Phe Gly Tyr Arg Leu Phe Arg Tyr Gly Ser Phe Phe 370 375 380 Lys Thr Ile Asp Gly Ile Met Ala Tyr His Gln Glu Pro Pro Gly Lys 385 390 395 400 Glu Asn Glu Thr Asp Arg Glu Ala Gly Lys Asn Ile Thr Leu Asp Ile 405 410 415 Met Arg Glu Lys Val Pro Tyr Ile Tyr Arg Lys Leu Leu Pro Ile Glu 420 425 430 Asp Ser His Ile Asn Arg Val Pro Leu Val Ser Ile Tyr Ile Pro Ala 435 440 445 Tyr Asn Cys Ala Asn Tyr Ile Gln Arg Cys Val Asp Ser Ala Leu Asn 450 455 460 Gln Thr Val Val Asp Leu Glu Val Cys Ile Cys Asn Asp Gly Ser Thr 465 470 475 480 Asp Asn Thr Leu Glu Val Ile Asn Lys Leu Tyr Gly Asn Asn Pro Arg 485 490 495 Val Arg Ile Met Ser Lys Pro Asn Gly Gly Ile Ala Ser Ala Ser Asn 500 505 510 Ala Ala Val Ser Phe Ala Lys Gly Tyr Tyr Ile Gly Gln Leu Asp Ser 515 520 525 Asp Asp Tyr Leu Glu Pro Asp Ala Val Glu Leu Cys Leu Lys Glu Phe 530 535 540 Leu Lys Asp Lys Thr Leu Ala Cys Val Tyr Thr Thr Asn Arg Asn Val 545 550 555 560 Asn Pro Asp Gly Ser Leu Ile Ala Asn Gly Tyr Asn Trp Pro Glu Phe 565 570 575 Ser Arg Glu Lys Leu Thr Thr Ala Met Ile Ala His His Phe Arg Met 580 585 590 Phe Thr Ile Arg Ala Trp His Leu Thr Asp Gly Phe Asn Glu Lys Ile 595 600 605 Glu Asn Ala Val Asp Tyr Asp Met Phe Leu Lys Leu Ser Glu Val Gly 610 615 620 Lys Phe Lys His Leu Asn Lys Ile Cys Tyr Asn Arg Val Leu His Gly 625 630 635 640 Asp Asn Thr Ser Ile Lys Lys Leu Gly Ile Gln Lys Lys Asn His Phe 645 650 655 Val Val Val Asn Gln Ser Leu Asn Arg Gln Gly Ile Thr Tyr Tyr Asn 660 665 670 Tyr Asp Glu Phe Asp Asp Leu Asp Glu Ser Arg Lys Tyr Ile Phe Asn 675 680 685 Lys Thr Ala Glu Tyr Gln Glu Glu Ile Asp Ile Leu Lys Asp Ile 690 695 700 8 965 PRT Pasteurella multocida 8 Met Asn Thr Leu Ser Gln Ala Ile Lys Ala Tyr Asn Ser Asn Asp Tyr 1 5 10 15 Glu Leu Ala Leu Lys Leu Phe Glu Lys Ser Ala Glu Thr Tyr Gly Arg 20 25 30 Lys Ile Val Glu Phe Gln Ile Ile Lys Cys Lys Glu Lys Leu Ser Thr 35 40 45 Asn Ser Tyr Val Ser Glu Asp Lys Lys Asn Ser Val Cys Asp Ser Ser 50 55 60 Leu Asp Ile Ala Thr Gln Leu Leu Leu Ser Asn Val Lys Lys Leu Thr 65 70 75 80 Leu Ser Glu Ser Glu Lys Asn Ser Leu Lys Asn Lys Trp Lys Ser Ile 85 90 95 Thr Gly Lys Lys Ser Glu Asn Ala Glu Ile Arg Lys Val Glu Leu Val 100 105 110 Pro Lys Asp Phe Pro Lys Asp Leu Val Leu Ala Pro Leu Pro Asp His 115 120 125 Val Asn Asp Phe Thr Trp Tyr Lys Asn Arg Lys Lys Ser Leu Gly Ile 130 135 140 Lys Pro Val Asn Lys Asn Ile Gly Leu Ser Ile Ile Ile Pro Thr Phe 145 150 155 160 Asn Arg Ser Arg Ile Leu Asp Ile Thr Leu Ala Cys Leu Val Asn Gln 165 170 175 Lys Thr Asn Tyr Pro Phe Glu Val Val Val Ala Asp Asp Gly Ser Lys 180 185 190 Glu Asn Leu Leu Thr Ile Val Gln Lys Tyr Glu Gln Lys Leu Asp Ile 195 200 205 Lys Tyr Val Arg Gln Lys Asp Tyr Gly Tyr Gln Leu Cys Ala Val Arg 210 215 220 Asn Leu Gly Leu Arg Thr Ala Lys Tyr Asp Phe Val Ser Ile Leu Asp 225 230 235 240 Cys Asp Met Ala Pro Gln Gln Leu Trp Val His Ser Tyr Leu Thr Glu 245 250 255 Leu Leu Glu Asp Asn Asp Ile Val Leu Ile Gly Pro Arg Lys Tyr Val 260 265 270 Asp Thr His Asn Ile Thr Ala Glu Gln Phe Leu Asn Asp Pro Tyr Leu 275 280 285 Ile Glu Ser Leu Pro Glu Thr Ala Thr Asn Asn Asn Pro Ser Ile Thr 290 295 300 Ser Lys Gly Asn Ile Ser Leu Asp Trp Arg Leu Glu His Phe Lys Lys 305 310 315 320 Thr Asp Asn Leu Arg Leu Cys Asp Ser Pro Phe Arg Tyr Phe Ser Cys 325 330 335 Gly Asn Val Ala Phe Ser Lys Glu Trp Leu Asn Lys Val Gly Trp Phe 340 345 350 Asp Glu Glu Phe Asn His Trp Gly Gly Glu Asp Val Glu Phe Gly Tyr 355 360 365 Arg Leu Phe Ala Lys Gly Cys Phe Phe Arg Val Ile Asp Gly Gly Met 370 375 380 Ala Tyr His Gln Glu Pro Pro Gly Lys Glu Asn Glu Thr Asp Arg Glu 385 390 395 400 Ala Gly Lys Ser Ile Thr Leu Lys Ile Val Lys Glu Lys Val Pro Tyr 405 410 415 Ile Tyr Arg Lys Leu Leu Pro Ile Glu Asp Ser His Ile His Arg Ile 420 425 430 Pro Leu Val Ser Ile Tyr Ile Pro Ala Tyr Asn Cys Ala Asn Tyr Ile 435 440 445 Gln Arg Cys Val Asp Ser Ala Leu Asn Gln Thr Val Val Asp Leu Glu 450 455 460 Val Cys Ile Cys Asn Asp Gly Ser Thr Asp Asn Thr Leu Glu Val Ile 465 470 475 480 Asn Lys Leu Tyr Gly Asn Asn Pro Arg Val Arg Ile Met Ser Lys Pro 485 490 495 Asn Gly Gly Ile Ala Ser Ala Ser Asn Ala Ala Val Ser Phe Ala Lys 500 505 510 Gly Tyr Tyr Ile Gly Gln Leu Asp Ser Asp Asp Tyr Leu Glu Pro Asp 515 520 525 Ala Val Glu Leu Cys Leu Lys Glu Phe Leu Lys Asp Lys Thr Leu Ala 530 535 540 Cys Val Tyr Thr Thr Asn Arg Asn Val Asn Pro Asp Gly Ser Leu Ile 545 550 555 560 Ala Asn Gly Tyr Asn Trp Pro Glu Phe Ser Arg Glu Lys Leu Thr Thr 565 570 575 Ala Met Ile Ala His His Phe Arg Met Phe Thr Ile Arg Ala Trp His 580 585 590 Leu Thr Asp Gly Phe Asn Glu Asn Ile Glu Asn Ala Val Asp Tyr Asp 595 600 605 Met Phe Leu Lys Leu Ser Glu Val Gly Lys Phe Lys His Leu Asn Lys 610 615 620 Ile Cys Tyr Asn Arg Val Leu His Gly Asp Asn Thr Ser Ile Lys Lys 625 630 635 640 Leu Gly Ile Gln Lys Lys Asn His Phe Val Val Val Asn Gln Ser Leu 645 650 655 Asn Arg Gln Gly Ile Asn Tyr Tyr Asn Tyr Asp Lys Phe Asp Asp Leu 660 665 670 Asp Glu Ser Arg Lys Tyr Ile Phe Asn Lys Thr Ala Glu Tyr Gln Glu 675 680 685 Glu Met Asp Ile Leu Lys Asp Leu Lys Leu Ile Gln Asn Lys Asp Ala 690 695 700 Lys Ile Ala Val Ser Ile Phe Tyr Pro Asn Thr Leu Asn Gly Leu Val 705 710 715 720 Lys Lys Leu Asn Asn Ile Ile Glu Tyr Asn Lys Asn Ile Phe Val Ile 725 730 735 Ile Leu His Val Asp Lys Asn His Leu Thr Pro Asp Ile Lys Lys Glu 740 745 750 Ile Leu Ala Phe Tyr His Lys His Gln Val Asn Ile Leu Leu Asn Asn 755 760 765 Asp Ile Ser Tyr Tyr Thr Ser Asn Arg Leu Ile Lys Thr Glu Ala His 770 775 780 Leu Ser Asn Ile Asn Lys Leu Ser Gln Leu Asn Leu Asn Cys Glu Tyr 785 790 795 800 Ile Ile Phe Asp Asn His Asp Ser Leu Phe Val Lys Asn Asp Ser Tyr 805 810 815 Ala Tyr Met Lys Lys Tyr Asp Val Gly Met Asn Phe Ser Ala Leu Thr 820 825 830 His Asp Trp Ile Glu Lys Ile Asn Ala His Pro Pro Phe Lys Lys Leu 835 840 845 Ile Lys Thr Tyr Phe Asn Asp Asn Asp Leu Arg Ser Met Asn Val Lys 850 855 860 Gly Ala Ser Gln Gly Met Phe Met Lys Tyr Ala Leu Pro His Glu Leu 865 870 875 880 Leu Thr Ile Ile Lys Glu Val Ile Thr Ser Cys Gln Ser Ile Asp Ser 885 890 895 Val Pro Glu Tyr Asn Thr Glu Asp Ile Trp Phe Gln Phe Ala Leu Leu 900 905 910 Ile Leu Glu Lys Lys Thr Gly His Val Phe Asn Lys Thr Ser Thr Leu 915 920 925 Thr Tyr Met Pro Trp Glu Arg Lys Leu Gln Trp Thr Asn Glu Gln Ile 930 935 940 Gln Ser Ala Lys Lys Gly Glu Asn Ile Pro Val Asn Lys Phe Ile Ile 945 950 955 960 Asn Ser Ile Thr Leu 965 9 972 PRT Artificial Sequence consensus sequence 9 Met Asn Thr Leu Ser Gln Ala Ile Lys Ala Tyr Asn Cys Asn Asp Tyr 1 5 10 15 Xaa Leu Ala Leu Lys Leu Phe Glu Lys Ser Ala Glu Ile Tyr Gly Arg 20 25 30 Lys Ile Val Glu Phe Gln Ile Ile Lys Cys Gln Glu Lys Leu Ser Ala 35 40 45 Asn Pro Ser Val Asn Glu Ala Asn Leu Ser Val Asn Glu Xaa Glu Lys 50 55 60 Asn Asn Val Cys Asp Ser Pro Leu Asp Ile Ala Thr Gln Leu Leu Ile 65 70 75 80 Ser Asn Val Lys Lys Leu Thr Leu Ser Xaa Ser Glu Lys Asn Ser Leu 85 90 95 Lys Asn Lys Trp Lys Leu Ile Thr Glu Lys Lys Ser Glu Asn Ala Glu 100 105 110 Xaa Arg Ala Val Ala Leu Val Pro Lys Asp Phe Pro Lys Asp Leu Val 115 120 125 Leu Ala Pro Leu Pro Asp His Val Asn Asp Phe Thr Trp Tyr Lys Asn 130 135 140 Arg Lys Lys Arg Leu Gly Ile Lys Pro Glu Asn Gln Asn Xaa Gly Leu 145 150 155 160 Ser Ile Ile Xaa Pro Thr Phe Asn Arg Pro Ala Ile Leu Asp Ile Thr 165 170 175 Leu Ala Cys Leu Val Asn Gln Lys Thr Asn Tyr Pro Phe Glu Val Xaa 180 185 190 Val Ala Asp Asp Gly Ser Gln Glu Xaa Leu Leu Pro Ile Xaa Arg Gln 195 200 205 Tyr Glu Xaa Lys Leu Asp Ile Arg Tyr Val Arg Gln Lys Asp Asn Gly 210 215 220 Xaa Gln Ala Cys Ala Ala Arg Asn Xaa Gly Leu Arg Leu Ala Lys Tyr 225 230 235 240 Asp Phe Xaa Gly Ile Leu Asp Cys Asp Met Ala Pro Xaa Gln Leu Trp 245 250 255 Val His Ser Tyr Leu Ala Glu Leu Leu Glu Asp Asp Asp Ile Thr Ile 260 265 270 Ile Gly Pro Arg Lys Tyr Xaa Asp Thr Gln Asn Ile Asp Ala Glu Xaa 275 280 285 Phe Leu Asn Xaa Ala Ser Leu Ile Glu Ser Leu Pro Glu Thr Ala Thr 290 295 300 Asn Asn Asn Pro Ala Ala Lys Gly Glu Gly Asn Xaa Ser Leu Asp Trp 305 310 315 320 Arg Leu Glu Gln Phe Glu Lys Thr Xaa Asn Leu Arg Leu Cys Asp Ser 325 330 335 Pro Phe Arg Xaa Phe Ala Ala Gly Asn Val Ala Phe Ala Lys Glu Trp 340 345 350 Leu Asn Lys Ser Gly Phe Phe Asp Glu Glu Phe Asn His Trp Gly Gly 355 360 365 Glu Asp Val Glu Phe Gly Tyr Arg Leu Phe Arg Lys Gly Cys Phe Phe 370 375 380 Arg Thr Ile Asp Gly Gly Met Ala Tyr His Gln Glu Pro Pro Gly Lys 385 390 395 400 Glu Asn Glu Thr Xaa Arg Glu Ala Gly Lys Asn Ile Thr Leu Asp Ile 405 410 415 Met Arg Glu Lys Val Pro Tyr Ile Tyr Arg Lys Leu Leu Pro Ile Glu 420 425 430 Asp Ser His Ile Asn Arg Xaa Pro Leu Val Ser Ile Tyr Ile Pro Ala 435 440 445 Tyr Asn Cys Ala Asn Tyr Ile Gln Arg Cys Val Asp Ser Ala Leu Asn 450 455 460 Gln Thr Val Val Asp Leu Glu Val Cys Ile Cys Asn Asp Gly Ser Thr 465 470 475 480 Asp Asn Thr Ile Glu Val Ile Asn Lys Leu Tyr Gly Asn Asn Pro Arg 485 490 495 Val Arg Ile Met Ser Lys Pro Asn Gly Gly Ile Ala Ser Ala Ser Asn 500 505 510 Ala Ala Val Ser Phe Ala Lys Gly Tyr Tyr Ile Gly Gln Leu Asp Ser 515 520 525 Asp Asp Tyr Leu Glu Pro Asp Ala Val Glu Leu Cys Leu Lys Glu Phe 530 535 540 Leu Lys Asp Lys Thr Leu Ala Cys Val Tyr Thr Thr Asn Arg Asn Val 545 550 555 560 Asn Pro Asp Gly Ser Leu Ile Ala Asn Gly Tyr Asn Trp Pro Glu Phe 565 570 575 Ser Arg Glu Lys Leu Thr Thr Ala Met Ile Ala His His Phe Arg Met 580 585 590 Phe Thr Ile Arg Ala Trp His Leu Thr Asp Gly Phe Asn Glu Asn Ile 595 600 605 Glu Asn Ala Val Asp Tyr Asp Met Phe Leu Lys Leu Ser Glu Val Gly 610 615 620 Lys Phe Lys His Leu Asn Lys Ile Cys Tyr Asn Arg Val Leu His Gly 625 630 635 640 Asp Asn Thr Ser Ile Lys Lys Leu Gly Ile Gln Lys Lys Asn His Phe 645 650 655 Val Val Val Asn Gln Ser Leu Asn Arg Gln Gly Ile Asn Tyr Tyr Asn 660 665 670 Tyr Asp Glu Phe Asp Asp Leu Asp Glu Ser Arg Lys Tyr Ile Phe Asn 675 680 685 Lys Thr Ala Glu Tyr Gln Glu Glu Ile Asp Ile Leu Lys Asp Ile Lys 690 695 700 Ile Ile Gln Asn Lys Asp Ala Lys Ile Ala Val Ser Ile Phe Tyr Pro 705 710 715 720 Asn Thr Leu Asn Gly Leu Val Lys Lys Leu Asn Asn Ile Ile Glu Tyr 725 730 735 Asn Lys Asn Ile Phe Val Ile Xaa Leu His Leu Asp Lys Asn His Leu 740 745 750 Thr Pro Asp Ile Lys Lys Glu Ile Leu Ala Phe Tyr His Lys His Gln 755 760 765 Val Asn Ile Leu Leu Asn Asn Asp Ile Ser Tyr Tyr Thr Ser Asn Arg 770 775 780 Leu Ile Lys Thr Glu Ala His Leu Ser Asn Ile Asn Lys Leu Ser Gln 785 790 795 800 Leu Asn Leu Asn Cys Glu Tyr Ile Ile Phe Asp Asn His Asp Ser Leu 805 810 815 Phe Val Lys Asn Asp Ser Tyr Ala Tyr Met Lys Lys Tyr Asp Val Gly 820 825 830 Met Asn Phe Ser Ala Leu Thr His Asp Trp Ile Glu Lys Ile Asn Ala 835 840 845 His Pro Pro Phe Lys Lys Leu Ile Lys Thr Tyr Phe Asn Asp Asn Asp 850 855 860 Leu Arg Ser Met Asn Val Lys Gly Ala Ser Gln Gly Met Phe Met Lys 865 870 875 880 Tyr Ala Leu Ala His Ala Leu Leu Thr Ile Ile Lys Glu Val Ile Thr 885 890 895 Ser Cys Gln Ser Ile Asp Ser Val Pro Glu Tyr Asn Thr Glu Asp Ile 900 905 910 Trp Phe Gln Phe Ala Leu Leu Ile Leu Glu Lys Lys Thr Gly His Val 915 920 925 Phe Asn Lys Thr Ser Thr Leu Thr Tyr Met Pro Trp Glu Arg Lys Leu 930 935 940 Gln Trp Thr Asn Glu Gln Ile Xaa Ser Ala Lys Arg Gly Glu Asn Ile 945 950 955 960 Pro Val Asn Lys Phe Ile Ile Asn Ser Ile Thr Leu 965 970 

What we claim is:
 1. A purified nucleic acid segment comprising a coding region encoding enzymatically active hyaluronate synthase from Pasturella, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment encodes the Pasturella hyaluronate synthase of SEQ ID NO:
 1. 2. The purified nucleic acid segment of claim 1, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment comprises a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 2. 3. A recombinant vector selected from the group consisting of a plasmid, cosmid, phage, or virus vector and wherein the recombinant vector further comprises a purified nucleic acid segment having a coding region encoding enzymatically active hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment encodes the Pasturella hyaluronan synthase of SEQ ID NO:
 1. 4. The recombinant vector of claim 3, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment comprises a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 2. 5. The recombinant vector of claim 3, wherein the plasmid further comprises an expression vector.
 6. The recombinant vector of claim 5, wherein the expression vector comprises a promoter operatively linked to the coding region.
 7. A recombinant host cell, wherein the recombinant host cell is a prokaryotic cell transformed with a recombinant vector comprising a purified nucleic acid segment having a coding region encoding enzymatically active hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment encodes the Pasturella hyaluronan synthase of SEQ ID NO:
 1. 8. The recombinant host cell of claim 7, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment comprises a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 2. 9. The recombinant host cell of claim 8, wherein the host cell produces hyaluronic acid.
 10. A recombinant host cell, wherein the recombinant host cell is a eukaryotic cell transfected with a recombinant vector comprising a purified nucleic acid segment having a coding region encoding enzymatically active hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment encodes the Pasturella hyaluronan synthase of SEQ ID NO:
 1. 11. The recombinant host cell of claim 10, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment comprises a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 2. 12. The recombinant host cell of claim 11, wherein the host cell produces hyaluronic acid.
 13. A recombinant host cell, wherein the recombinant host cell is transformed to introduce a recombinant vector into the recombinant host cell, wherein the recombinant vector comprises a purified nucleic acid segment having a coding region encoding enzymatically active hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment encodes the Pasturella hyaluronan synthase of SEQ ID NO:
 1. 14. The recombinant host cell of claim 13, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment comprises a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 2. 15. The recombinant host cell of claim 14, wherein the host cell produces hyaluronic acid.
 16. A recombinant host cell, wherein the recombinant host cell is transduced with a recombinant vector comprising a purified nucleic acid segment having a coding region encoding enzymatically active hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment encodes the Pasturella hyaluronan synthase of SEQ ID NO:
 1. 17. The recombinant host cell of claim 16, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment comprises a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 2. 18. The recombinant host cell of claim 17, wherein the host cell produces hyaluronic acid.
 19. A purified and isolated nucleic acid sequence encoding enzymatically active hyaluronan synthase, the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of: (a) the nucleic acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2; and (b) complementary nucleic acid sequences to the nucleic acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 and which encode an enzymatically active hyaluronan synthase.
 20. A purified and isolated nucleic acid segment consisting essentially of a nucleic acid segment encoding enzymatically active hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella, wherein the purified nucleic acid segment encodes the Pasturella hyaluronan synthase of SEQ ID NO:
 1. 21. A procaryotic or eucaryotic host cell transformed or transfected with an isolated nucleic acid segment according to claim 1 in a manner allowing the host cell to express hyaluronic acid.
 22. An isolated nucleic acid segment consisting essentially of a nucleic acid segment encoding hyaluronan synthase from Pasturella having a nucleic acid segment sufficiently duplicative of the nucleic acid segment as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 to allow possession of the biological property of coding for Pasturella hyaluronan synthase.
 23. A cDNA sequence according to claim
 22. 24. A procaryotic or eucaryotic host cell transformed or transfected with a nucleic acid segment according to claim 1, 19, 20, or 22 in a manner allowing the host cell to express hyaluronic acid. 